Zimbábue começa a votar em eleições com suspeitas de fraude


31/07/2013 - 13:59


HARARE, Zimbábue (AFP)
Cerca de 6,5 milhões de eleitores do Zimbábue começaram a votar nesta quarta-feira em eleições presidenciais com suspeitas de fraude em benefício do presidente Robert Mugabe, de 89 anos, no poder há 33 anos.
Os colégios eleitorais abriram às 07h00 (02h00 de Brasília) e fecharão às 19h00 (14h00 de Brasília).
Quatro horas antes da abertura, já havia filas para votar nestas eleições presidenciais, mas também legislativas e municipais.
Robert Mugabe, que no passado foi escolhido em eleições marcadas por fraude e violência, prometeu na terça-feira ao vivo na televisão que acataria o resultado das urnas.
Mas o MDC, o partido de seu rival histórico e primeiro-ministro Morgan Tsvangirai, denunciou fraudes. Em 2009, Tsvangirai aceitou o cargo de primeiro-ministro sob a presidência de seu eterno rival sob a pressão da comunidade internacional para evitar uma guerra civil no país.
Mugabe, que junto ao seu clã controla as forças de segurança, o exército, a polícia e os meios de comunicação, é acusado por várias ONGs de criar um clima de intimidação contra seus rivais.
    copiado  http://www.afp.com/pt

Maquinista de trem acidentado na Espanha 'não entende' o que ocorreu

31/07/2013 - 13:41


MADRI (AFP)
O maquinista do trem acidentado em Santiago de Compostela afirma que não entende por que não freou a tempo e evitou a catástrofe, que deixou 79 mortos, em um trecho de seu depoimento perante o juiz publicado nesta quarta-feira pelo jornal El País.
"Meritíssimo, sinceramente digo que não sei, não estou tão louco a ponto de não frear", explica o maquinista Francisco José Garzón Amo durante seu interrogatório no domingo pelo juiz Luis Aláez.
No dia 24 de julho às 20h42 (15h42 de Brasília), o trem procedente de Madri com mais de 250 pessoas a bordo descarrilou em uma curva perigosa a 4 km da estação de Santiago, uma zona onde a linha, de alta velocidade até esse momento, se transforma em via convencional e a velocidade se limita a 80 km/h.
"Você ativou o freio em algum momento?", pergunta o juiz.
Sim, mas "já era inevitável", responde o maquinista neste trecho de áudio publicado no site do jornal.
"Não tive tempo para nada", reconhece o homem, visivelmente alterado. "Não dou uma explicação porque não entendo até agora (o que aconteceu)", afirma quando o juiz pergunta por que não reduziu antes a velocidade do trem.
As primeiras informações fornecidas na terça-feira pelas caixas-pretas do trem revelaram que ele circulava a 192 km/h poucos quilômetros antes do acidente e que freou apenas segundos antes de descarrilar, a 153 km/h, se chocando contra um muro de contenção em sua chegada a Santiago.
O áudio gravado nas caixas-pretas também mostrou que o maquinista falava no telefone no momento do acidente com um funcionário da Renfe, a companhia ferroviária espanhola, que havia telefonado pouco antes "para indicar o caminho que deveria seguir ao chegar a Ferrol", seu destino final, informou o Tribunal Superior de Justiça da Galícia.
Neste momento, "parece que o maquinista consulta um plano ou algum documento similar em papel", segundo o tribunal.
Garzón, um maquinista experiente de 52 anos, foi acusado de 79 homicídios por imprudência, mas ficou em liberdade sob controle judicial.
   copiado  http://www.afp.com/pt

Explosão deixa um ferido no centro de Atenas

31/07/2013 - 13:29


ATENAS (AFP)
Uma explosão deixou um ferido e danos materiais perto de um restaurante no centro de Atenas na madrugada desta quarta-feira, informaram os bombeiros.
A explosão ocorreu pouco antes das 02h30 GMT (23h30 de Brasília) no bairro de Kolonaki, zona cêntrica e abastada da capital grega.
Segundo uma testemunha entrevistada no local pela AFP, um artefato explosivo foi lançado em direção ao estabelecimento por homens que se deslocavam em uma motocicleta, mas um funcionário do restaurante o recolheu e o jogou para a calçada, onde ocorreu a explosão.
O homem foi atendido pelas equipes de resgate, mas não foi especificada a natureza de sua lesões.
Na rua, fechada ao trânsito pela polícia, havia vidros quebrados e era possível ver ao menos dois veículos e janelas danificadas, constatou a AFP.
  copiado  http://www.afp.com/pt

ONU alerta para aumento de vítimas civis no conflito afegão

31/07/2013 - 13:10


CABUL (AFP)
A ONU alertou nesta quarta-feira sobre uma escalada de 23% no número de vítimas civis no Afeganistão durante o primeiro semestre de 2013, a um ano e meio da retirada das forças da Otan do país.
"A escalada do número de mortos e de feridos, homens, mulheres ou crianças, conduziu a um aumento de 23% no número de vítimas civis durante os seis primeiros meses do ano de 2013 em relação ao mesmo período em 2012", indicou um relatório da missão da ONU no Afeganistão (UNAMA) publicado nesta quarta-feira.
O conflito no Afeganistão, entre os insurgentes talibãs, expulsos do poder em 2001, e as forças afegãs e uma coalizão internacional deixou, entre 1 de janeiro e 30 de julho de 2013, 1.319 mortos (14% a mais em relação ao primeiro semestre de 2012) e 2.533 feridos (28% a mais) entre os civis.
Deste número, 74% das vítimas se devem diretamente a ataques ou atentados de rebeldes.
 copiado  http://www.afp.com/pt

Pai de Edward Snowden o aconselha a ficar na Rússia

31/07/2013 - 12:11

Pai de Edward Snowden o aconselha a ficar na Rússia


MOSCOU (AFP)
O pai de Edward Snowden aconselhou seu filho a permanecer na Rússia, o país para o qual o ex-consultor da Agência Nacional de Segurança dos Estados Unidos (NSA), buscado por espionagem, pediu asilo provisório.
"Penso que a Rússia tem a intenção firme e a possibilidade de proteger meu filho. Em seu lugar, ficaria na Rússia", disse Lon Snowden em uma entrevista divulgada pela rede de televisão russa Rossia 24.
Edward Snowden é exigido pela justiça americana, que o acusa de espionagem por ter revelado a existência de um sistema americano de vigilância mundial das comunicações telefônicas e por internet.
"Ed, está tudo bem em casa. Te amamos e espero que nos vejamos em breve. Mas antes de tudo quero que você esteja em segurança", disse Snowden.
"Se eu fosse ele, estaria agradecido pelas ofertas de Venezuela, Equador e Bolívia, mas já vimos o que aconteceu com o avião do presidente Evo Morales", disse o pai de Snowden.
Edward Snowden está bloqueado desde 23 de junho na zona de trânsito do aeroporto de Moscou Cheremtievo e pediu asilo temporário à Rússia.
O chefe dos serviços de migração russos, Konstantin Romodanovski, disse que não havia nada de novo em relação ao pedido de Snowden.
Por sua vez, o conselheiro da presidência russa encarregado dos Direitos Humanos, Mikhail Fedotov, disse que a Rússia estava em uma situação "pouco invejável".
"Não podemos extraditar alguém que pediu a proteção de nosso Estado. Mas, por outro lado, não queremos arruinar nossas relações com os Estados Unidos, um sócio em vários assuntos internacionais", disse.
"Na saga Snowden a Rússia é uma vítima. Para nós não tem nenhum interesse", destacou Fedotov.
À espera de obter o asilo temporário, Snowden leu 'Crime e Castigo', de Fiódor Dostoyevski, e pediu a obra completa em 18 volumes do historiador russo Nikolai Karamzin, especializado no século XIX, disse seu advogado Anatoli Kucherena
copiado  http://www.afp.com/pt

Em nota oficial, o Ministério Público critica o corte do Governo sem diálogo com os poderes e questiona o aumento da arrecadação estadual.


Nota Oficial
MP critica corte do Governo no orçamento estadual 

MP critica corte do Governo no orçamento estadual

Em nota oficial, o Ministério Público critica o corte do Governo sem diálogo com os poderes e questiona o aumento da arrecadação estadual.

Diógenes Dantas,
Elpídio Júnior
O corte de R$ 686,9 milhões no orçamento dos três poderes (executivo, legislativo e judiciário)  anunciados pelo Governo foram criticados pelo Ministério Público. Em nota divulgada nesta terça-feira (30), os promotores e procuradores criticam a falta de diálogo do Governo e questionam a arrecadação estadual.
Leia a nota:
 NOTA DE ESCLARECIMENTO
O Ministério Público do Estado do RN, a respeito da publicação do Decreto n. 23.624/2013, na edição do Diário Oficial do Estado do dia 27 deste mês, que reprograma a execução orçamentária e financeira do exercício de 2013, vem a público informar que:
I) não foi previamente comunicado pelo Poder Executivo que este publicaria o referido Decreto, não tendo qualquer integrante do governo, nem mesmo através de ligação telefônica, informado o Ministério Público da possibilidade de reprogramação da execução financeira e orçamentária desta Instituição;
II) não houve reunião entre a chefia do Ministério Público e o Governo do Estado para tratar de tal decreto, nem convite para tanto;
III) a área técnica do MPRN, por sua Diretoria de Orçamento e Finanças, foi informada pela equipe técnica do Governo do Estado da intenção deste de promover corte linear da execução orçamentária, para todos os Poderes e Órgãos com autonomia orçamentária e financeira, de 10,7% do orçamento global de cada um, restando certo que os números pertinentes seriam analisados com vistas a posteriores conversas entre o Executivo e os demais interessados, na busca de entendimento sobre o assunto;
IV) antes, contudo, de qualquer tratativa entre a chefia do MPRN e o Governo do Estado, este publicou o referido decreto de reprogramação orçamentária e financeira, o que nos causou surpresa;V) os cortes promovidos pelo Governo do Estado atingem praticamente todo o custeio e investimento do Ministério Público, o que é totalmente inaceitável, em face de todos os compromissos e contratos já firmados e de projetos em curso;
VI) dados de conhecimento do Ministério Público revelam crescimento da arrecadação global do Estado em relação ao exercício de 2012, sendo a frustração da receita alegada pelo Governo decorrente de elevada estimativa do que ingressaria nos cofres públicos em 2013;
VII) ao Ministério Público não foi repassada a metodologia de cálculo da previsão imaginada de 10,74% de frustração de receita para o ano de 2013, tal como publicado no Decreto n. 23.624/2013, sendo que, pelos dados do próprio Governo, a frustração real do primeiro semestre foi da ordem de 5,24%;
VIII) O Ministério Público lamenta a decisão unilateral do Poder Executivo e informa que está analisando as medidas legais cabíveis quanto ao assunto.
MINISTÉRIO PÚBLICO DO ESTADO DO RIO GRANDE DO NORTE
copiado http://nominuto.com

Propaganda do Governo será suspensa em televisões, rádios e jornais do RN Suspensão atende a determinação do juiz Marcos Vinícius de Currais Novos para cumprimento de um serviço de saúde.

Guerra do orçamento

Clegg attacks 'go home' campaign against illegal immigrants


  • Home Office 'Go Home' van

    Clegg attacks 'go home' campaign

    Deputy prime minister says he objects to campaign's tone and that it is 'not a very clever way' of dealing with the issue
    635 comments
    Deputy prime minister says he objects to campaign's tone and that it is 'not a very clever way' of dealing with the issue
    Home Office 'Go Home' van
    Nick Clegg said the sight of 'go home' vans on the streets was 'unsettling to communities'. Photograph: Home Office/PA
    Nick Clegg has launched a strong attack on the government's "go home" campaign against illegal immigrants, suggesting it was out of step with the "decent" centre-ground tradition in British politics.
    In a phone-in on Radio 5 Live on Tuesday, the deputy prime minister said he did not condone people breaking immigration laws but that he objected to the tone of the campaign launched by the Home Office.
    He also said it would be hard for his ministerial colleagues in the coalition to persuade him that the campaign should be extended.
    Clegg, who returned to work on Monday after a break in Spain, was speaking only 24 hours after Downing Street indicated that David Cameron strongly supported the campaign and would be open to it being extended nationwide.
    The campaign is running in six London boroughs featuring leaflets and posters with the message: "In the UK illegally? Go home or face arrest." The leaflets are still in circulation, but the two advertising vans that drove around displaying large versions of the poster have been withdrawn.
    "I was very surprised to see these two vans apparently driving aimlessly around north London," said Clegg, who has not criticised the posters publicly before, although his aides made it clear that he disapproved last week.
    "I don't think it was a very clever way of dealing with this issue of those who are living in this country who aren't entitled to."
    Clegg said he was in favour of taking a hard line against law breaking, but that he was concerned about the tone of the campaign. "You can enforce the law effectively without instilling a tone which is unsettling to communities, particularly to mixed communities."
    He said he had discussed the matter on Monday with Mark Harper, the Conservative immigration minister, whom he described as "a very good guy". Clegg said he told Harper the Home Office should instead focus on improving border checks.
    "I don't happen to think having a couple of vans driving around north London is the way of inspiring public confidence that we have an immigration system that is working properly," Clegg said.
    "I have said to the Home Office in very clear terms … that the effort should be spent not on vans drifting around north London, but actually reinstating exit checks, which I think were wrongly removed in the past and which we are committed to – and this was on my personal insistence – reinstating as part of our coalition agreement."
    Some critics have claimed that the Conservatives have been promoting the hardline anti-illegal immigration message for party political reasons. Clegg hinted that he agreed, but he argued that "decent" people in the centre ground would object.
    "The Conservative party three years ago presented itself as green, compassionate and a centre-ground party, and now appears to be resorting, if you like, to some more traditional, Conservative, right-of-centre signature tunes, Europe, immigration, welfare, Europe, immigration, welfare," he said.
    "Important though those issues are, I remain of the view, as a centrist politician, as someone who is determined to anchor the government in the centre ground, that actually the vast majority of decent people in this country are in the centre ground, and want to see politicians governing from the centre, not from either the right or the left."
    Clegg went on: "Unless there's overwhelming evidence that this [campaign] is a really effective way of bolstering public confidence in the immigration system, and bearing down on illegal behaviour in the immigration system, I'm going to need a lot of persuasion this is something [we want to continue]."
    Clegg spoke out as a YouGov poll for the Sun suggested that, by a margin of 47% to 41%, voters support the campaign.
    In an article in the Daily Mail on Tuesday, Harper said that the opposition to the campaign was astonishing and that the government was simply trying to encourage illegal immigrants to leave the UK voluntarily. The posters and leaflets feature a text number that illegal immigrants can use if they want help to leave the UK.
    "Let me clear this up once and for all – it is not racist to ask people who are here illegally to leave Britain. It is merely telling them to comply with the law," he wrote.
    Harper said that those opposed to the campaign were in effect asking the government to condone law breaking. "No society that encourages people to break its laws can survive. That, however, is precisely what our critics are asking us to do. But no responsible government could ever give up on its duty to enforce the law – and that is certainly not what this government will do."
    The Home Office has only spent £10,000 on the campaign and officials said that, provided at least one illegal immigrant who might otherwise have been subject to enforced removal decided to leave voluntarily as a result, it could be deemed a success.
    But a full assessment will not take place until later this summer. The two advertising vans were only in operation for a week, but the leaflets are still in circulation and the Home Office will be monitoring responses to the text number for another three weeks.
    Governments have been running programmes for many years to encourage people who are in the UK illegally to leave voluntarily, in some cases even funding their flights home.
    Over the last decade the number of so-called voluntary departures has increased considerably. There were 28,309 in the year ending in March 2013, of which 3,744 were "assisted voluntary returns" where financial assistance was provided.
      COPY http://www.theguardian.com
  • Barclays fights FCA report into 2008 cash call


    Barclays fights FCA report into 2008 cash call

    30 Jul 2013: Bank contests findings of investigation by regulator into fundraising activities from Middle Eastern investors 
     

    Barclays fights FCA report into 2008 cash call

    Bank contests findings of investigation by regulator into fundraising activities from Middle Eastern investors
    Barclays bank
    Barclays has refused to reveal the conclusions reached by the City regulator. Photograph: Toby Melville/Reuters

    Barclays is contesting the findings of an investigation by the Financial Conduct Authority into its fundraising at the height of the banking crisis five years ago.
    The investigation was first revealed a year ago, in the wake of the Libor rigging scandal, when Barclays admitted that its finance director Chris Lucas – who is leaving the bank next year – was among four individuals being scrutinised over the disclosure of fees paid during two fundraisings from Middle Eastern investors that took place in 2008.
    The bank, which is also being investigated alongside the four employees, refused to reveal the conclusions reached by the City regulator but said it was contesting them. The regulator has not yet issued a formal warning notice, which would outline more details of its case, but the completion of the preliminary investigation comes as the bank prepares to draw up a prospectus asking investors to back a £6bn cash call vital to plug a £12.8bn capital shortfall.
    Antony Jenkins, the bank's chief executive, refused to elaborate on the FCA findings at a time when the bank is under particular scrutiny by shareholders who must decide whether to back the crucial fundraising exercise.
    In a formal statement contained in seven pages of legal and regulatory warnings, the bank said the FCA had provided its preliminary findings on 27 June and that it had responded to these on 25 July.
    "Barclays expects further developments in the near term," it added.
    The City regulator's investigation was later followed by other authorities. In August last year, the Serious Fraud Office also began an investigation into the matter while in October the US regulator the Securities and Exchange Commission and the justice department launched an investigation to establish if there were any breaches of the US foreign corrupt practices act.
    Last July when Barclays first disclosed the investigation by City regulator – then the Financial Services Authority – Barclays said that it "considers that it satisfied its disclosure obligations and confirms that it will co-operate fully with the FSA's investigation."
    The bank said on Tuesday that the investigation was specifically into "certain commercial agreements between Barclays and Qatari interests and whether they have related to Barclays capital raisings in June and November 2008".
    "Barclays is co-operating with all the authorities fully. It is not possible to estimate the financial impact upon Barclays should any adverse findings be made," the bank said.
     COPY http://www.theguardian.com/uk-new

    Police in north-east England arrest man as part of Twitter abuse investigation


    Police in north-east England arrest man as part of Twitter abuse investigation

    30 Jul 2013: Detention of 25-year-old over online threats to female MP and feminist follows arrest of man aged 21 in Manchester
    Detention of 25-year-old over online threats to female MP and feminist follows arrest of man aged 21 in Manchester

    Crackdown on abusive tweets urged
    Stella Creasy MP (left) and Caroline Criado-Perez. Both have suffered online abuse. Photograph: Chris Ratcliffe/PA
    Police investigating allegations of harassment on Twitter have arrested a 25-year-old man in north-east England.
    The online abuse was aimed at Labour MP Stella Creasy and Caroline Criado-Perez, a feminist campaigner.
    The arrest by Northumbria police on Tuesday was carried out on behalf of the Metropolitan police and came two days after a 21-year-old was detained in the Manchester area on suspicion of committing harassment offences.
    The police operation began after Criado-Perez was deluged on Twitter with abuse and threats of rape.
    A Met spokesman said on Tuesday: "This arrest will form part of two ongoing MPS [Metropolitan police service] investigations relating to allegations made to police by two separate victims, who made reports of malicious communication to police on 25 and 29 July."
    Criado-Perez, a journalist, suffered abuse on Twitter after successfully campaigning for a woman to appear on UK banknotes.
    She has said Twitter needs to "get a grip" on security, claiming the social network was ill-equipped to handle episodes of sustained abuse and needed to work more closely with police to deal with internet trolls.
    Criado-Perez met Twitter directors on Monday along with Creasy, the MP for Walthamstow, who received similarly abusive messages after offering support to Criado-Perez.
    Twitter has been in contact with the police over the abuse.
    A spokesman said: "We value the feedback from our users and are testing ways of simplifying the reporting process, including a broad rollout of in-Tweet reporting beyond the current availability on the iPhone app and mobile web."  COPY http://www.theguardian.com/uk-new

    Manning cleared of 'aiding the enemy' but found guilty of five espionage charges


    • Bradley Manning

      Manning cleared of 'aiding the enemy' but found guilty of five espionage charges

      Live Bradley Manning convicted of multiple Espionage Act violations
      • Acquitted of most serious 'aiding the enemy' charge
      • Army private faces maximum jail sentence of 130 years


      Bradley Manning verdict: guilty of most charges but not 'aiding enemy' – live

      • Bradley Manning faces maximum 130-year sentence
      • Convicted of most charges against him at Fort Meade
      • Not guilty of most serious 'aiding the enemy' charge
      • Follow live updates
      Read our latest news story
      James Ball, the Guardian's data editor, writes that "the Obama administration didn't merely go through the motions" in pursuit of Bradley Manning; military authorities "imposed a charge that should have sparked far greater alarm than it did".
      They argued that by talking to the media, Manning had "aided the enemy" – a charge tantamount to treason, which can carry the death penalty (though this was not pursued in Manning's case).
      This is not so much the beginning of a slippery slope for a democratic nation as a headlong plummet. A guilty verdict would have redefined the media – from outlets such as WikiLeaks to bastions of the establishment like the New York Times – as proxies for the enemy. It would have ended any distinction between a traitor selling military secrets to the highest bidder and someone speaking to a journalist on a matter of conscience and for no reward.
      By finding Manning not guilty on this dangerous charge (though guilty of espionage and theft), military judge colonel Denise Lind has pulled the US back from the precipice – for now. But that outcome does not alter the fact that such a charge was sought by prosecutors in the first place.
      Manning leaves Fort Meade today after hearing the judge's verdict.
      Bradley Manning leaves court after being convicted of espionage and theft charges
      Bradley Manning leaves a military court facility in Maryland after being convicted of espionage and theft charges on Tuesday. Photograph: SAUL LOEB/AFP/Getty Images
      Bill Keller, former editor of the New York Times, heralded the not
      guilty verdict on the aiding the enemy charge as a "victory of common
      sense over petty vindictiveness", writes Ed Pilkington:
      Under Keller's editorship in 2010, the New York Times joined forces with the Guardian and Der Spiegel to publish many of the first WikiLeaks disclosures.
      Keller said that in his opinion, Manning had displayed a complicated mix of personal and political motives, but that the judge had been right to dismiss the US government's allegation that he had knowingly assisted al-Qaida by transmitting documents to WikiLeaks. "I haven't seen any evidence he intended or even imagined that his disclosures would help America's enemies."
      The former Times editor said Lind had spared America serious consequences by avoiding setting a precedent that would have exposed all future official leakers to the accusation that they "aided the enemy". He said that had a guilty verdict been delivered, even innocuous journalism such as public opinion polls might have been emperiled.
      "If you follow that logic every poll that says Americans want to get out of Afghanistan, every story about popular discontent over drone strikes or surveillance, every statement that casts the country in an unfavorable light – it all boosts morale at al-Qaida headquarters, and thus aids the enemy."
      Amnesty International has said "it’s hard not to draw the conclusion that Manning's trial was about sending a message: the US government will come after you".
      Widney Brown senior director of international law and policy at the human rights charity, said in a statement that the US government's "priorities are upside down".
      The US government has refused to investigate credible allegations of torture and other crimes under international law despite overwhelming evidence.
      Yet they decided to prosecute Manning who it seems was trying to do the right thing - reveal credible evidence of unlawful behaviour by the government. You investigate and prosecute those who destroy the credibility of the government by engaging in acts such as torture which are prohibited under the US Constitution and in international law.
      The government’s pursuit of the ‘aiding the enemy’ charge was a serious overreach of the law, not least because there was no credible evidence of Manning’s intent to harm the USA by releasing classified information to WikiLeaks.
      You can read the full Amnesty International statement here.
      The American Civil Liberties Union has accused the US government of "seeking to intimidate" anyone who might consider whistle blowing in the future in prosecuting Manning under the Espionage Act. Here's the ACLU's full statement commenting on the Manning verdict:
      While we're relieved that Mr. Manning was acquitted of the most dangerous charge, the ACLU has long held the view that leaks to the press in the public interest should not be prosecuted under the Espionage Act," said Ben Wizner, director of the ACLU's Speech, Privacy and Technology Project. "Since he already pleaded guilty to charges of leaking information – which carry significant punishment – it seems clear that the government was seeking to intimidate anyone who might consider revealing valuable information in the future.
      Updated

      Manning family issue statement

      The family of Bradley Manning has issued a statement to the Guardian giving their reaction to today’s verdict. The statement is written by Manning’s US-based aunt, who has asked to remain anonymous, speaking on behalf of the soldier’s family:
      While we are obviously disappointed in today’s verdicts, we are happy that Judge Lind agreed with us that Brad never intended to help America’s enemies in any way. Brad loves his country and was proud to wear its uniform.
      We want to express our deep thanks to David Coombs, who has dedicated three years of his life to serving as lead counsel in Brad’s case. We also want to thank Brad’s Army defense team, Major Thomas Hurley and Captain Joshua Tooman, for their tireless efforts on Brad’s behalf, and Brad’s first defense counsel, Captain Paul Bouchard, who was so helpful to all of us in those early confusing days and first suggested David Coombs as Brad’s counsel. Most of all, we would like to thank the thousands of people who rallied to Brad’s cause, providing financial and emotional support throughout this long and difficult time, especially Jeff Paterson and Courage to Resist and the Bradley Manning Support Network. Their support has allowed a young Army private to defend himself against the full might of not only the US Army but also the US Government.
      Updated
      Colonel Denise Lind, the military judge presiding over the court
      martial of the US soldier, delivered her verdict in curt and pointed
      language, writes Ed Pilkington from Fort Meade:
      “Guilty, guilty, guilty, guilty,” she repeated over and over, as the reality of a prolonged prison sentence for Manning on top of the three years he has already spent in detention dawned.
      The one ray of light in an otherwise bleak outcome for the Army private was that he was found not guilty of the single most serious charge against him - that he knowingly “aided the enemy”, in practice al-Qaida, by disclosing information to the WikiLeaks website that in turn made it accessible to all users including enemy groups. Lind’s decision to avoid setting a precedent by applying the swingeing “aiding the enemy” charge to an official leaker will invoke a sigh of relief from news organisations and civil liberties groups who had feared a guilty verdict would send a chill across public interest journalism.
      Lind also found Manning not guilty of having leaked an encrypted copy of a video of a US airstrike in the Farah province of Aghanistan in which many civilians died. Manning’s defence team had argued vociferously that he was not the source of this video, though the soldier did admit to later disclosure of an unencrypted version of the video and related documents.
      The judge also accepted Manning’s version of several of the key dates in the WikiLeaks disclosures, and took off some of the edge from other less serious charges. But the overriding toughness of the verdict remains: the soldier was found guilty in their entirety of 17 out of the 22 counts against him, and of an amended version of four more.
      Once the counts are cumulatively added up, the prospects for the Army private are bleak. Barring reduction of sentence for mitigation, which becomes the subject of another mini-trial dedicated to sentencing that starts tomorrow, he will face a substantial chunk of his adult life in military custody.
      The consequences for Manning, and for the wider world of whistleblowing and official leaking in the digital age, will take time to sink in.
      Bradley Manning's defense attorney David Coombs and Coomb's wife Tanya Monestier arrive at court for the verdict in Manning's military trial at Fort Meade, Maryland.
      Bradley Manning's defense attorney David Coombs and Coomb's wife Tanya Monestier arrive at court for the verdict in Manning's military trial at Fort Meade, Maryland. Photograph: Gary Cameron/Reuters
      Updated

      Summary

      Bradley Manning has been found not guilty of aiding the enemy but still faces up to 130 years in prison after being found guilty on several counts of theft and espionage.
      The military judge hearing the case, Army Col Denise Lind, gave her verdict at 1pm on Tuesday. The aiding the enemy charge was the most serious, as it carried a maximum sentence of life in prison without the possibility of parole.
      However Manning could still face an effective life sentence after being convicted on numerous other counts. He was found guilty of five charges of theft and five charges of espionage as well as other offenses. His convictions carry a maximum sentence of up to 130 years in prison.
      Manning's sentencing hearing will begin tomorrow.
      Updated
      Alexa O'Brien, who has been in court for every day of Manning's trial, tweeted the individual charges Manning faced and the judge's verdict on each as it was given.
      Although Manning has been cleared of the aiding the enemy charge, his convictions mean he could still face a lengthy prison sentence.

      What we know

      Information is still filtering out of Fort Meade – we will have a full report from Ed Pilkington shortly – but for the moment, this is what we know:
      • Bradley Manning has been found not guilty of aiding the enemy
      • Manning has been found guilty of five espionage charges
      • He has been found guilty of five theft charges

      Manning found not guilty of aiding the enemy

      Manning has been found not guilty of the most serious charge of "aiding the enemy". However the private has been found guilty on five counts of violating the espionage act.
      Updated
      From Fort Meade, Ed writes:
      As we wait for Colonel Denise Lind to enter court, a military lawyer is talking us through some of the possible next steps in the case after the verdict. He's confirmed a couple of interesting points:
      * The maximum sentence that Manning could face is life in military custody if he is found guilty of "aiding the enemy" and 154 years in jail if he is found guilty of all the remaining 20 counts. There is no minimum sentence for any of the total of 21 charges.
      That means that theoretically Lind could find Manning guilty of all 21 offences, then go on to sentence him in a few days or weeks to let him walk from court having reduced his actual sentence to nothing. Don't hold your breath though.
      * If the soldier is eventually sentenced to more than six months in custody, or given a punitive discharge, he will automatically be entitled to an appeal to the Army Court of Criminal Appeals. That suggests that a lengthy and fraught appeals process is all but certain.
      Yochai Benkler, law professor and director of the Berkman Center for Internet & Society at Harvard University, appeared as a witness for Manning's defence.
      On Comment is free recently he explained why the 'aiding the enemy' charge Manning faces is a threat to journalism, arguing that the judge's refusal to dismiss the charge "establishes a chilling precedent: leaking classified documents to the these newspapers can by itself be legally sufficient to constitute the offense of 'aiding the enemy', if the leaker was sophisticated enough about intelligence and how the enemy uses the internet".
      Debra Van Poolen, 44, a Manning supporter, has spent every day of the eight-week trial on the public benches of the courtroom in Fort Meade, Maryland, writes Ed Pilkington from Fort Meade.
      She’s spent the time sketching the US soldier, so she has developed a pretty intimate sense of his demeanour.
      “He’s been incredibly attentive 100 per cent of the time,” she says. “Usually he’s sitting on the edge of his seat, often with a pen in his hand, often taking notes, staring straight ahead at whatever is happening in court at the time.”
      Catching a convincing likeness of the Army private in her drawings has been a challenge, Van Poolen says, because he is so tiny, barely 5ft 2inches tall. “I’m always amazed by how small his hands are, they look like the hands of a woman or a boy.
      “He’s so small that I find it hard to draw the features of his face accurately, though I think I’ve managed to get him down in a couple of sketches.”
      Poolen is donating 80% of the proceeds from the sale of her sketches to the Bradley Manning Support Network's legal defense fund andClaire Lebowitz's Washington DC production of the play "bradass87", she says.
      A watercolour sketch of Bradley Manning by Debra Van Poolen
      Debra Van Poolen has spent the last eight weeks in the Fort Meade courtroom, sketching Bradley Manning. Photograph: Debra Van Poolen
      A supporter of Bradley Manning protests outside the main gate before the reading of the verdict in Manning's military trial at Fort Meade.
      A supporter of Bradley Manning protests outside the main gate before the reading of the verdict in Manning's military trial at Fort Meade. Photograph: James Lawler Duggan/Reuters
      The judge is due to start delivering her verdict from 1pm, but there could be problems with getting the verdict out quickly, according to numerous reports.
      Journalists have been told they will not be allowed to leave once the court is in session. Phones are not allowed in the courtroom, so they will have to attempt to leave, get their phones, before calling in the decision. This could obviously mean a delay.
      Updated
      The scores of Bradley Manning supporters who have started to gather on a street corner outside the Fort Meade military base don’t look a particularly glum bunch – in fact they seem to be in high spirits under a blazing Maryland sun, Ed Pilkington writes from the court.
      But ask them what they think today’s verdict holds for the WikiLeaks source and they speak with one gloomy voice.
      “I’m afraid it’s going to go against Manning completely,” says Bill Wagner, 75, a former official at NASA HQ. Paradoxically, he thought that a wall-to-wall guilty verdict might in the long run have a beneficial impact as “at least it would get people’s attention.”
      As we’re speaking, the driver of a car passing by the base shouts out at us: “They ought to hang him!” which puts the opinions of the Manning crowd in perspective.
      Joel Greenfield, a trainee electrician aged 23, has driven all the way from Los Angeles to catch the end of the trial and despite such commitment he too is feeling despondent. “Three years is enough” says the placard he is carrying.
      “I realise what’s going to happen here today - they are going to find him guilty.” Greenfield is putting all his hopes for a not guilty verdict into just one charge, the most serious one “aiding the enemy”.
      In his view, if Manning is convicted of this charge then “that means the American people are the enemy. He exposed war crimes, he told the American people what our government was doing in our name.”
      Karen Steele’s cowgirl hat comes in handy on such a blisteringly hot day. She’s attended almost every day of pre-trial hearings and much of the eight week trial proper.
      Her observation of the trial judge, Colonel Denise Lind, who will deliver the verdict alone in the absence of the jury, makes her feel pretty depressed too. “My heart tells me that this girl is all military,” she says, referring to Lind. “I fear Bradley’s going down for a long time.”
      Updated
      Buzzfeed has updated its detailed look at "Who is Bradley Manning?" – featuring lots of photos and accounts from his early life up to his military career and arrest. It's a good piece and gives some perspective on what Manning's upbringing and military career.
      My colleague Ed Pilkington is at Fort Meade and reports that the mood is not positive among Manning's supporters.
      The silence of gay rights groups over the fate of Bradley Manning has been "deafening", Christopher Carbone writes today for Comment is Free:
      First, Manning is the opposite of everything that these groups seek to portray as the image of "gay Americans". I use those quotes because the majority of LGBT Americans don't conform to these upwardly mobile, white, polished, virile male stereotypes. Manning doesn't look like CNN anchor Anderson Cooper. With his slight frame, lower-class background, questioning of his gender identity, inability to hold down a typical job, general dorkiness and dysfunctional family life, Manning does not fit the poster boy image that GLAAD or the Human Rights Campaign would hold up and promote. It's bizarre because Manning is actually what many, if not most, LGBT people have been at one point or another – an outsider, a loner, a person who does not fit in or conform.
      Second, organizations like the HRC, which had net assets of over $32.7m at the end of last year and claims more than a millions members and supporters, happens to have the financial backing of major military industrial corporations, including Lockheed Martin, which is sponsoring the HRC's upcoming national gala in Washington DC and Booz Allen Hamilton, a corporate partner for the national event, as well as Northrop Grumman a sponsor of their Los Angeles gala.
      Updated

      Manning arrives at court

      Bradley Manning has arrived at Fort Meade, according to reporters at the court. A verdict is expected at around 1pm, although it is unclear at the moment how quickly information will filter out. Journalists are not allowed to tweet or email from the courtroom, but can leave to file updates.
      Bradley Manning arrives alongside a military official at a US military court facility for the verdict in his trial at Fort Meade, Maryland
      Bradley Manning arrives alongside a military official at a US military court facility for the verdict in his trial at Fort Meade, Maryland Photograph: Saul Loeb/AFP/Getty Images
      Updated
      My colleague Ed Pilkington has followed the Manning trial since it began. He was in court in Fort Meade last Thursday as the prosecution "unleashed a wave of rhetoric against the army private" in closing arguments.
      At the culmination of almost four hours in front of the judge, [Major Ashden Fein, the lead prosecutor] sought to press home the most serious and contentious charge against Manning – that he knowingly "aided the enemy" by transmitting state secrets to WikiLeaks.
      "He was not a humanist; he was a hacker who described his fellow soldiers as 'dykes' or 'global idiots'. He was not a troubled young soul; he was a determined soldier with the ability, knowledge and desire to harm the US. He was not a whistleblower; he was a traitor."
      The next day Manning's lawyer, David Coombs, "ridiculed the prosecution case as a 'diatribe'", Ed wrote.
      Over four hours of intense closing arguments at Fort Meade in Maryland, David Coombs set up a moral and legal clash of characterisations, between the Manning that he laid out for the court, and the callous and fame-obsessed Manning sketched on Thursday by the US government. "What is the truth?" the lawyer asked Colonel Denise Lind, the presiding judge who must now decide between the two accounts to reach her verdict.
      "Is Manning somebody who is a traitor with no loyalty to this country or the flag, who wanted to download as much information as possible for his employer WikiLeaks? Or is he a young, naive, well-intentioned soldier who has his humanist belief central to his decisions and whose sole purpose was to make a difference."
      A military judge today announces her decision in the trial of the former intelligence analyst, Bradley Manning, accused of the biggest-ever leak of US state secrets. 
      The judge, Colonel Denise Lind, is expected to give her verdict in about three hours' time, at 1pm ET on Tuesday. Manning faces 21 counts including espionage, computer fraud and theft charges. He has already offered a guilty plea to 10 lesser charges.
      The most serious charge – that he knowingly "aided the enemy" by transmitting intelligence to WikiLeaks – carries a possible sentence of life in a military prison without the chance of parole. But Manning will not be sentenced today – that will be decided after a further hearing.
      During the eight-week trial, which ended on Friday, the US government has argued that Manning knew he was helping al-Qaida when he released more than 700,000 documents to WikiLeaks.
      Manning's legal team has sought to depict Manning as a naive but well-intentioned young man, who was motivated by deep Humanist beliefs and who wanted to prompt a debate within US society about the costs of war.
      Debate has also centered over whether WikiLeaks is a journalistic organisation, in the same manner as the New York Times or the Guardian, who published key revelations. Lind's verdict could have potentially serious implications for the future of investigative journalism in the US.
      Follow live updates here through the morning and as Lind announces her decision. Our correspondent Ed Pilkington is at Fort Meade and we will be hearing from him throughout the day.
      COPY  http://www.theguardian.com/uk

    Ministra italiana pede fim de racismo

    30/07/2013 - 21:15

    Ministra italiana pede fim de racismo

    ROMA, Latium (AFP)
    A ministra italiana para a Integração, Cécile Kyenge, de origem congolesa, exigiu nesta terça-feira, em Roma, que cessem os atos de racismo e intolerância contra a sua pessoa, principalmente por militantes do partido Liga Norte.
    "Se o secretário deste partido não impedir seus membros, não participarei da conferência a qual me convidaram em agosto", disse a ministra Kyenge.
    No sábado, duas bananas foram lançadas contra ela como um gesto de discriminação pela cor de sua pele, depois de ter sido comparada a um orangotango dias antes por um dos líderes da Liga do Norte.
    Kyenge falava em um comício do Partido Democrata (PD, esquerda), quando um espectador não identificado atirou bananas, que não chegaram a atingir a ministra, mas que provocou reações de rejeição generalizadas no país.
    Kyenge, médica, cidadã italiana nascida na República Democrática do Congo, tem sido alvo de ataques racistas desde que foi nomeada ministra.
    "Mesmo que tenhamos ideias diferentes, devemos nos enfrentar no campo das ideias e não dos insultos", ressaltou Kyenge.
    "É por isso que concordei em participar de um evento da Liga do Norte em 3 de agosto", disse, alertando que rejeitará o convite devido aos gestos racistas "que me ferem pessoalmente e especialmente ferem a consciência civil do país" .
    "Se não pararem, declinarei do convite", concluiu.COPIADO http://www.afp.com/pt/

    Manning é culpado de violar lei de espionagem, mas não de conluio com inimigo

    30/07/2013 - 19:53


     

    FORT MEADE, Estados Unidos / Maryland (AFP)
    Bradley Manning, o soldado americano que vazou milhares de documentos secretos do governo dos Estados Unidos para o site WikiLeaks, foi considerado culpado pela Justiça militar de violação da lei sobre espionagem, mas não de conluio com inimigo.
    De acordo com a sentença lida pela juíza Denise Lind, Manning incorre em 154 anos de prisão após ser condenado por várias acusações relacionadas à violação da lei sobre a espionagem.
    COPIADO http://www.afp.com/pt/

    EUA: israelenses e palestinos querem acordo em nove meses

    30/07/2013 - 19:48

    EUA: israelenses e palestinos querem acordo em nove meses

    WASHINGTON, District of Columbia (AFP)
    Os negociadores israelenses e palestinos que retomaram o diálogo em Washington concordaram em voltar a se reunir em duas semanas, com o objetivo de alcançar um acordo final em nove meses, declarou nesta terça-feira o secretário de Estado americano, John Kerry.
    As duas partes devem se reunir em Israel ou nos Territórios Palestinos e "nosso objetivo será" alcançar um "acordo sobre o status final no decorrer dos próximos nove meses", indicou Kerry aos jornalistas, após o reinício das negociações de paz bloqueadas há três anos.
    O Quarteto para o Oriente Médio, formado pelos Estados Unidos, Rússia, União Europeia e Nações Unidas, fez um apelo a Israel e aos palestinos que não "minem a confiança" neste momento em que reiniciam as negociações de paz.
    O grupo prometeu seu apoio às duas partes no "compromisso de conseguir uma solução negociada de dois estados no prazo acertado de nove meses".
    COPIADO  http://www.afp.com/pt/

    TOP ASIA STORIES - About 200 inmates escape in Pakistan Taliban attack on prison

    uly 30, 2013 -- Updated 1352 GMT (2152 HKT)
    Taliban gunmen wearing police uniforms attacked a central jail in northwestern Pakistan early Tuesday, allowing about 175 inmates to escape, authorities said. FULL STORY

    From Zahir Shah Sherazi, for CNN
    July 30, 2013 -- Updated 1552 GMT (2352 HKT)
    Policemen stand outside the Central Prison after an overnight Pakistan Taliban militant attack in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa on July 30.
    Policemen stand outside the Central Prison after an overnight Pakistan Taliban militant attack in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa on July 30.
    STORY HIGHLIGHTS
    • NEW: About 200 inmates escape, 35 of them high-profile militants, an official says
    • NEW: Bombs have been defused and weapons were recovered
    • The Pakistan Taliban claim responsibility for the attack
    • Official says four police officials and five militants were killed in the attack
    Peshawar, Pakistan (CNN) -- Taliban gunmen wearing police uniforms attacked the largest jail in a northern Pakistani province early Tuesday, allowing about 200 inmates to escape, authorities said.
    Around 35 of the escaped prisoners are high-profile militants, said Pervaiz Khattak, the chief minister of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, the province where the attack took place.
    During the fighting that followed the assault at the prison in the city of Dera Ismail Khan, four police officials and five militants were killed, said Shoukat Yousafzai, the provincial information minister.
    There were 483 prisoners at the time of the attack, and a total of 200 have gone missing, according to Mushtaq Jadoon, the Dera Ismail Khan police commissioner.
    The gunmen cut off the prison's power supply, then launched the attack from all sides, said Malik Qasim Khan, an adviser to the chief minister on prisons. Multiple explosions were reportedly heard.
    Jadoon said that the attackers announced the names of the people they wanted to free after they entered the jail and whisked the people away.
    The Pakistan Taliban claimed responsibility for the attack. Locals said they heard chants of Allah O Akbar, "God is great" and long live the Taliban soon after the explosion and firing.
    Taliban spokesman Shahidaullah Shahid said the group freed around 300 prisoners, a claim that Pakistani army officials denied. Shahid described the operation as a success.
    Inayatullah Tiger,, a bomb disposal squad official, told CNN that forces have defused 350-kilogram bombs planted in various parts of the jail. Suicide jackets, other bombs and explosives-laden chemical drums have also been defused and weapons have been recovered, he said.
    1,200 inmates break out of Benghazi prison

    TOP ASIA STORIES

    Postagem em destaque

    Ao Planalto, deputados criticam proposta de Guedes e veem drible no teto com mudança no Fundeb Governo quer que parte do aumento na participação da União no Fundeb seja destinada à transferência direta de renda para famílias pobres

    Para ajudar a educação, Políticos e quem recebe salários altos irão doar 30% do soldo que recebem mensalmente, até o Governo Federal ter f...