Abbas Swears In a New Palestinian Government
By ISABEL KERSHNER and JODI RUDOREN
The transitional body is intended to unify the West Bank and Gaza, but it could also complicate relations with Israel.
JERUSALEM
— President Mahmoud Abbas of the Palestinian Authority swore in a
transitional government on Monday intended to unify the West Bank and
Gaza after seven years of division, though the run-up was marred by
last-minute disputes over its composition.
The
move is likely to complicate further the Palestinians’ already fraught
relations with Israel and put them under international scrutiny because
the new government is supported by Hamas, the Islamic militant group
that is designated as a terrorist organization by Israel, the United
States, the European Union and others.
The new government is the result of a reconciliation pact reached in April
between the Palestine Liberation Organization, which is dominated by
Mr. Abbas’s mainstream nationalist Fatah faction, and Hamas, which has
been in control of Gaza since 2007.
Israeli
officials said that no decisions had been taken regarding sanctions
against the new government, but the cabinet was expected to meet to
discuss options.
Prime
Minister Rami Hamdallah, a professor of linguistics who has held the
top post in the West Bank-based Palestinian Authority government for the
past year, retains his position. The government is composed of an
additional 16 ministers described by Palestinian officials as
technocrats — professionals who are members of neither Fatah nor Hamas.
Three of them are women; about half served in the last Palestinian
Authority government.
The new government is meant to prepare for elections in six months or more.
The
swearing-in ceremony at Mr. Abbas’s headquarters in the West Bank city
of Ramallah took 10 minutes. Each minister took an oath and shook hands
with Mr. Abbas and Mr. Hamdallah.
“We
have ended a black time for our Palestinian people,” Mr. Abbas said.
“Today we restore our national unity, the unity of our institutions.”
He added: “The Palestinian people will be united.”
But Mahmoud Zahar, a senior Hamas official, told reporters in Gaza that only four of the ministers were proposed by his group.
And
four of the ministers, residents of Gaza, were unable to attend. Israel
refused to issue permits for three of them, who had applied ahead of
time, to pass through its territory, a sign that the physical split
between the West Bank and Gaza was likely to remain in force.
Mr.
Abbas said the government would follow his political program in support
of a negotiated, two-state solution for the Israeli-Palestinian
conflict. Palestinian officials said it would also abide by
international principles laid down by world powers, including the
recognition of Israel’s right to exist, the renunciation of violence,
and the acceptance of all previous signed agreements between the P.L.O.
and Israel. Hamas itself has not accepted these conditions.
In
Gaza, Ismail Haniya, the leader of the outgoing Hamas government there,
said, “Today we are leaving this government after seven years of
steadfastness during which we faced political and economic problems.”
“We
are leaving our chairs but not our role,” he said, adding that he was
standing down “willingly and in response to our national
responsibilities.”
The
State Department has said that the United States, which is scheduled to
provide $440 million in aid to the Palestinian Authority this year,
will monitor the situation closely and judge any government based on its
composition, policy and actions. The European Union, which gives
substantial aid to the authority, has said it will continue direct
financial assistance so long as the new government is technocratic and
upholds the international principles.
But Israel says the new government “rests on Hamas” and has called on the international community not to embrace it.
On
Monday, hours before the swearing-in, Yuval Steinitz, Israel’s minister
of intelligence and strategic affairs, told reporters in Jerusalem that
the new government was “illegitimate” and did not live up to the
previous signed agreements with Israel.
One
of the fundamental principles of the Oslo peace accords of the 1990s,
he said, was that territory handed over to the Palestinians would be
demilitarized.
“Currently,
however, we estimate that there are between 11,000 and 12,000 missiles
and rockets in Gaza, as well as thousands of mortar shells, some
anti-tank and antiaircraft missiles,” Mr. Steinitz said, adding that
many of the weapons were smuggled into Gaza from Iran.
“One
could expect that Abu Mazen would immediately announce that he will
begin to dismantle those 12,000 Iranian missiles and rockets,” he said,
referring to Mr. Abbas by his popular name. “If not, then actually you
have a Palestinian government no longer committed to the principle of
demilitarization.”
Earlier
Monday, the Israeli air force struck what the military described as
“two terror sites” in the Gaza Strip following two rocket attacks
against Israel in the last two days. No injuries were reported on either
side.
Ahmad
Majdalani, a member of the P.L.O.'s executive committee, said Monday
that Israel was sparing no attempt “to incite against the government”
and to turn the international community against it. “We believe that
ending the division will support the peace process,” he told the
official Voice of Palestine radio.
Khalil
Shikaki, a prominent Palestinian political analyst and pollster based
in Ramallah, said Hamas had shown a surprising amount of flexibility in
its demands regarding the government.
“The
reconciliation process is moving on and Hamas seems to be making
greater concessions on this than Fatah,” he said by telephone. That, he
said, was an indication of Hamas’s weakness. But Mr. Shikaki added that
Hamas was also getting important benefits, including holding on to its
security forces in Gaza, while one of the advantages of the deal for Mr.
Abbas was that “he now can claim that he speaks for both the West Bank
and Gaza.”
Hamas
won Palestinian elections in 2006. A year later it took control of Gaza
after a brief but bloody factional war there, routing Mr. Abbas’s
forces and confining his authority to parts of the West Bank. The schism
has been highly unpopular among the Palestinian public, though the
latest unity deal brings uncertainty with it.
“Before
this reconciliation it was a black-and-white situation,” said Abdel
Hadi Tulayb, 52, a taxi driver in Ramallah. “Fatah is good and Hamas is
bad, or vice versa. Now, we are united, but we don’t know what will
happen later.”
Many Palestinians expressed hope that the deal would improve their economic situation, though others said they were skeptical.
“I
don’t expect any positive results from this government,” said Shadi
Hani, 29, a construction worker in Ramallah. “We want to work in Israel
and we are like beggars. I cannot go to Israel to work — I need a
permit.”
Previous
attempts at national unity have fizzled even before they reached the
stage of forming a government, and on Monday, there were already signs
of deep discord.
The
sides are divided over the issues of government representation for
Palestinians who are held in Israeli jails and whether the Palestinian
Authority’s security coordination with Israel should continue.
Mr.
Abbas has made it clear that he wants to maintain the security
coordination. But Fathi Hammad, the outgoing interior minister of the
former Hamas government in Gaza, called on the authority at his farewell
party at a Gaza hotel to cut off the coordination with Israel
“irreversibly.”
Kobi
Michael, a former head of the Palestinian desk at the Israeli Ministry
of Strategic Affairs and now a senior research fellow at the Institute
for National Strategic Studies at Tel Aviv University, said he expected
the security coordination would continue at the same level because “it
is a core strategic interest of both sides.”
The
Palestinian Authority, he wrote in an email, still “needs protection
from Hamas, which remains a political and military threat.”
Mkhaimer
Abusaada, a political scientist at Al-Azhar University in Gaza, said
that Hamas and its constituency were unhappy with Mr. Abbas’s conduct in
forming the government.
“Hamas
has given up on many, many issues,” he said in a telephone interview.
“They feel that they have been neglected by Abu Mazen and that Abu Mazen
is humiliating them through this formation of this government.”
copy http://international.nytimes.com/
Nenhum comentário:
Postar um comentário