November 29, 2012 -- Updated 1409 GMT (2209 HKT)
Jane Harman says with decrees and protests,
Egypt's government and oppositon show little capacity to entertain
opposing views, essential in a democracy
November 29, 2012 -- Updated 1409 GMT (2209 HKT)
STORY HIGHLIGHTS
- Jane Harman: Egypt's opposition, governing party planned dueling million-man marches
- She says this Egyptian model of neither working in the system nor compromising isn't useful
- She says Morsy court takeover, fractious constitutional process show poor grasp of politics
- Harman: Constitution must respect separation of powers; secularists must get in process
Editor's note: Jane
Harman is director, president and CEO of the Woodrow Wilson
International Center for Scholars. She was a nine-term congresswoman
from California and the ranking Democrat on the House Intelligence
Committee from 2002-2006.
(CNN) -- I see your million-man march and raise you
another million. That's the game the Muslim Brotherhood and opposition
parties were playing in Egypt this week.
After President Mohammed Morsy granted himself sweeping new temporary emergency powers, his opponents vowed to send a million protestors to the streets yesterday. Morsy's supporters responded by announcing their own equally massive gathering.
Jane Harman
Fortunately, cooler heads
prevailed, and a deal was struck between Morsy and Egypt's judges, who
had threatened a countrywide strike. But too often, the
"winner-takes-all" Mubarak model persists in Egyptian politics. Instead
of engaging or working within the system, and compromising, opposition
forces protest in Tahrir Square or boycott. While these tactics won a
revolution, they will not build a democracy.
Morsy's government won
worldwide acclaim last week when it achieved two enormously impressive
victories (albeit with no input from the so-called secular liberal
parties): a ceasefire in Gaza and a commitment of $4.8 billion from the
International Monetary Fund, with billions from the European Union to
follow.
Become a fan of CNNOpinion
Stay up to date on the latest opinion, analysis and conversations through social media. Join us at Facebook/CNNOpinion and follow us @CNNOpinion on Twitter. We welcome your ideas and comments.
But a day later, claiming
that the work product of the country's 100-member Constitutional
Assembly could be jeopardized, Morsy suspended the ability of the
independent court system to review or block the draft constitution,
which is due to be released in less than two weeks. A plebiscite is to
follow in 60 days and then an election of the new parliament (the old
one was declared invalid by the now-neutered court system).
What to make of all this?
It's the politics, stupid, or the absence of capacity on both sides to
entertain opposing views and forge compromise. (Steven Spielberg's
"Lincoln" may be the most relevant and compelling how-to guide this
season.)
Egyptian government drafting constitution
Egypt's crisis over within 15 days?
Sign of the times in Egypt
Watch: On the ground in Tahrir Square
Last week, during my
third trip to Egypt this year, I suggested to the secretary general and a
leading member of the Constitutional Assembly that they reach out to a
group, nominally led by former Arab League director and former
presidential candidate Amr Moussa, who is now boycotting the process. I
made the same suggestion to top aides to Morsy. They are suspicious that
Moussa has political motives. But, hey, of course he does! As do they.
To be legitimate,
Egypt's new constitution will need to respect the separation of powers
(including an independent judiciary) and accommodate political
differences in a document that passes the international smell test. It
cannot move women back to the Stone Age, and it must embrace pluralism
and tolerance for all religions.
On the other side,
liberals and human rights advocates want to play odds that this
government will overreach and fail. Well, it might. But that's no
guarantee they'll come next, especially if they don't bring good
political skills with them. And their outside game shortchanges the
Egyptian people, whose need for food, jobs, fairness and respect are
now.
The secular liberals
need to get in the game, not just into Tahrir Square. If they do, they
can insist on amendments to the constitutional draft that will
incorporate their own vision for the future of Egypt.
More million-man (and woman) marches aren't enough.
Follow @CNNOpinion on Twitter
Join us at Facebook/CNNOpinion
The opinions expressed in this commentary are solely those of Jane Harman.
COPY http://edition.cnn.com/
Nenhum comentário:
Postar um comentário