Hacker group Anonymous is no match for North Korea
Why a group that broke into MasterCard and the Vatican couldn't crack into one of the world's poorest countries.- Snowden's best choice is to stay in Russia indefinitely
- Ecuador's other political asylum case
- Meet the Brazilian woman whose life was changed by DOMA
- How America compares to the world on gay rights
-
Here's what happens to people who stay in airport limbo indefinitely
The latest attack was planned to coincide with the anniversary of the Korean War, on Tuesday. Anonymous said its goals were to obtain North Korean documents on the country’s weapons and government officials; to connect North Korea’s highly regulated intranet to the wider Internet, thus allowing North Korean citizens to finally connect to the outside world. Anonymous even said it would access nuclear weapons sites.
Anonymous had claimed, back in April, to have successfully hacked into North Korea’s walled-off intranet. As colleague Caitlin Dewey explained, that was extremely unlikely; the North Korean Web is physically separated from the rest of the Internet. And Anonymous’s evidence of a successful hack – a series of names and e-mail addresses purportedly belonging to North Korean propagandists – was actually a list of Chinese names.
Some hackers, presumably members of Anonymous, quickly claimed to possess the names of 2 million North Korean workers’ party members and 40,000 U.S. troops on the peninsula. That’s an odd claim, as North Korea scholar Marcus Noland pointed out, given that there are only 28,500 U.S. troops there. Anonymous has claimed other information gets, but has not proven them, and analysts don’t seem convinced.
The failed hacks are a reminder that North Korea has demonstrated, against all odds, its remarkable ability to seal itself off from a world very, very eager to peer in. This doesn’t just include hacker collectives like Anonymous: it’s not hard to find current and former U.S. intelligence officials who concede that they have very little solid information about its inner workings. Partly this is about North Korea’s better-than-you-might think technological capabilities. Partly it’s about the country’s willingness to forgo the vast economic benefits of integration that have long since tempted most countries, or at least individual people within them, to connect to the outside world. But it’s also about the country’s ideological stakes in information isolation: the more time passes, the more South Korea’s economy grows relative to the North and the greater an interest North Korea leaders have in making sure its people learn as little as possible about life on the outside. Incentives that powerful tend to be effective – more effective, even, than otherwise successful hackers.
COPY http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs