Top World Stories - Israel releases Palestinian prisoners amid protests

October 31, 2013 -- Updated 1102 GMT (1902 HKT)
Israel released 26 Palestinian prisoners early Wednesday, part of an agreement that fueled new peace talks. But Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas said all prisoners must be released before any peace deal. FULL STORY

From Matthew Chance, CNN
October 30, 2013 -- Updated 1021 GMT (1821 HKT)
Watch this video

Israelis angered over prisoner release

STORY HIGHLIGHTS
  • NEW: Abbas says there can be no peace deal until all prisoners have been freed
  • The Palestinian Prison Authority says a total of 26 prisoners have been released
  • It is the second time in recent months that Israel has freed prisoners
  • The release is part of an agreement that jump-started stalled peace talks
Ramallah, West Bank (CNN) -- Israel released 26 Palestinian prisoners early Wednesday, part of an agreement that fueled new peace talks.
The released prisoners were the second of four groups -- roughly 100 prisoners -- expected to be freed in a deal cobbled together by the United States to jump-start stalled Israeli-Palestinian peace talks.
The Palestinian Prison Authority confirmed 21 prisoners were released shortly after midnight in the West Bank and another five were released in Gaza.
Families of the prisoners were on hand in the West Bank, where cheers went up as buses carrying the prisoners arrived.
But the prison release has angered some Israelis, who protested outside the West Bank prison where the inmates where held before their release.
Oded Karamani said he sees the release of his brother's killer as a betrayal.
"It makes me feel like I got stabbed in my back, and they turned the knife, and turned the knife," Karamani said.
Ronen Karamani, 18, was abducted in 1990 and stabbed to death near Jerusalem. Two Palestinians were convicted in connection with his murder.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has called the decision to free Palestinian prisoners one of the most difficult of his career.
But many Israeli officials, including the defense minister, have said it is part of a long-term security strategy.
Israel released more than two dozen Palestinian prisoners in August on the eve of new peace talks. Some of them had been held for more than 20 years.
The first prisoner release came after Israel said it would forge ahead with a plan to build 900 housing units in East Jerusalem, which the Palestinians hope will be the capital of their future state.
The issue of Israeli settlements derailed the last round of direct talks, in 2010, and critics of Netanyahu say building on disputed territory could derail the new talks.
Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas welcomed the prisoners' release, describing it as a "day of joy." But he warned that there would be no peace agreement with Israel until all Palestinian prisoners had been freed.
"Our true joy will not be complete until we bring everyone out of prison," he told Palestine TV.
Salma Abdelaziz and Saad Abedine contributed to this report.

Top World Stories

TOP AFRICA STORIES - 87 perish in desert in Niger - Five more held in deadly Westgate mall attack in Kenya

87 people, mostly women and children, died after their vehicles broke down as they crossed the Sahara in search of a new life.

Plus de 19 millions de chômeurs dans la zone euro

Le chômage a atteint 12,2 % de la population active pour les 17 pays de la zone euro en septembre, soit près d'un million de demandeurs d'emploi supplémentaires sur un an.

Plus de 19 millions de chômeurs dans la zone euro

Le chômage a atteint 12,2 % de la population active pour les 17 pays de la zone euro en septembre, soit près d'un million de demandeurs d'emploi supplémentaires en un an.

Preuve que la crise économique continue de fragiliser le marché du travail en Europe, le chômage a atteint un niveau record en septembre dans la zone euro, touchant 12,2 % de la population active, a indiqué jeudi 31 octobre l'office statistique de l'Union européenne. Ainsi, 19,44 millions de personnes étaient au chômage dans les 17 pays de la zone euro le mois dernier, soit près d'un million de plus (996 000) que l'année précédente, et 60 000 comparé à août.

En revanche, élargi à l'ensemble des 28 Etats de l'Union européenne, le taux de chômage était de 11 % en septembre, ce qui représente au total 26,87 millions de personnes. Les pays les plus concernés restent l'Espagne et la Grèce, très lourdement frappés par la crise, où le chômage touche plus d'un actif sur quatre et nettement plus d'un jeune sur deux. Les taux les plus bas ont été enregistrés en Autriche (4,9 %), en Allemagne (5,2 %) et au Luxembourg (5,9 %).
Par ailleurs, les chiffres du chômage de juillet et d'août ont été révisés à la hausse (à 12,1 % et 12,2 % respectivement), annulant ainsi le recul du chômage qui avait été évoqué précédemment et constituait une première depuis février 2011. Copy http://www.lemonde.fr/europe

EXCLUSIVO-Síria destruiu instalações de produção de armas química, diz Opaq

  

EXCLUSIVO-Síria destruiu instalações de produção de armas química, diz Opaq 

  09:28 BRST

BEIRUTE, 31 Out (Reuters) - A Síria destruiu todos as instalações declaradas de produção de armas químicas, cumprindo uma meta fundamental de um ambicioso programa de desarmamento do país, disse o organismo internacional de fiscalização das armas químicas em um documento obtido pela Reuters.
BEIRUTE, 31 Out (Reuters) - A Síria destruiu todos as instalações declaradas de produção de armas químicas, cumprindo uma meta fundamental de um ambicioso programa de desarmamento do país, disse o organismo internacional de fiscalização das armas químicas em um documento obtido pela Reuters.
A Organização para a Proibição de Armas Químicas (Opaq) disse no documento que suas equipes inspecionaram 21 de 23 locais de armas químicas na Síria. Os outros dois eram perigosos demais para serem inspecionados, mas equipamentos químicos já haviam sido removidos para outros locais que foram visitados pelos especialistas, segundo a Opaq.
"A Opaq está satisfeita de ter verificado, e ter visto destruídos, equipamentos de todos os 23 locais importantes de produção/mistura/preenchimento declarados", disse o documento.
Sob um acordo mediado por Rússia e Estado Unidos, o governo sírio aceitou destruir todas as suas armas químicas, após Washington ter ameaçado usar a força em resposta à morte de centenas de pessoas em um ataque com gás sarin nos arredores de Damasco em 21 de agosto.
copiado  http://br.reuters.com

Syria's chemical weapons production facilities destroyed, says watchdog


  • Syrian weapons factories destroyed, says watchdog

    OPCW digger, Syria, 19/10/13
    International chemical weapons observer OPCW says country has met obligation in disarmament programme
    International chemical weapons watchdog OPCW says it's team has inspected 21 out of 23 chemical weapons sites in Syria
    OPCW digger, Syria, 19/10/13
    A Syrian television still shows a mechanical digger from the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons at work in an undisclosed location. Photograph: AFP/Getty Images
    Syria has destroyed all of its declared chemical weapons production and mixing facilities, meeting a key deadline in an ambitious disarmament programme, the international chemical weapons watchdog said in a document seen by Reuters.
    The Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons said its teams had inspected 21 out of 23 chemical weapons sites across the country. The other two were too dangerous to inspect but the chemical equipment had already been moved to other sites which experts had visited, it said.
    "The OPCW is satisfied it has verified, and seen destroyed, all declared critical production/mixing/filling equipment from all 23 sites," the document said.
    Under a Russian-American-brokered deal, Damascus agreed to destroy all its chemical weapons after Washington threatened to use force in response to the killing of hundreds of people in a sarin attack on the outskirts of Damascus on 21 August. It was the world's deadliest chemical weapons incident since Saddam Hussein's forces used poison gas against the Kurdish town of Halabja 25 years ago.
    The United States and its allies blamed Syrian president Bashar al-Assad's forces for the attack and several earlier incidents. Assad has rejected the charge, blaming rebel brigades.
    Under the disarmament timetable, Syria was due to render unusable all production and chemical weapons filling facilities by 1 November - a target it has now met. By mid-2014 it must have destroyed its entire stockpile of chemical weapons.
    The next deadline is 15 November, by when the OPCW and Syria must agree to a detailed plan of destruction, including how and where to destroy more than 1,000 metric tonnes of toxic agents and munitions.
    Ralf Trapp, an independent chemical weapons disarmament specialist, said the destruction of Syria's declared chemical weapons production and mixing facilities was a "major milestone" in the effort to eliminate the country's chemical weapons.
    "Most of the sites and facilities declared by Syria to the OPCW have been inspected, their inventories verified, equipment for chemical weapons production disabled and put beyond use, and some of the unfilled weapons have also been disabled," he said.
    At one of those locations the OPCW said it was able to verify destruction work remotely, while Syrian forces had abandoned the other two sites.
    Trapp said it was "important to ensure that the remaining facilities can be inspected and their equipment and weapons inventoried and prepared for destruction as soon as possible".
    The OPCW mission is being undertaken in the midst of Syria's civil war, which has killed more than 100,000 people. The unprecedented conditions had raised concerns that the violence would impede the disarmament, but the OPCW says Syrian authorities have been cooperating with the weapons experts, who have been able to visit all but three of the chemical sites.
    Syrian authorities said that "the chemical weapons programme items removed from these sites were moved to other declared sites", an OPCW document said. "These sites holding items from abandoned facilities were inspected."
    The OPCW has not said which sites it has been unable to visit, but a source briefed on their operations said one of them was in the Aleppo area of northern Syria and another was in Damascus province.
    One major chemical weapons site is located close to the town of Safira, south-east of Aleppo. Assad's forces have bombarded the town in recent weeks in an attempt to expel rebel fighters including al Qaida-linked brigades.  Copy http://www.theguardian.com/

Energy firms 'overcharge by £3.7bn a year'


  • Stephen Fitzpatrick, chief executive of small supplier Ovo Energy MPs told that some suppliers cannot justify increases in household bills

    Stephen Fitzpatrick, chief executive of small supplier Ovo Energy
    Stephen Fitzpatrick: 'It looks to me like a lot of energy companies are charging the maximum price they feel they can get away with.' Photograph: Andy Rain/EPA
    Some of Britain's biggest energy companies have been accused of raising households bills for no reason and systematically overcharging customers by £3.7bn a year as they were grilled by MPs over their soaring prices and profits.
    They were taken to task by Stephen Fitzpatrick, the chief executive of small supplier Ovo Energy, who launched a stinging attack on his larger rivals for being "the best filibusters in the business" when it comes to revealing how they make their money.
    After British Gas, npower, SSE and Scottish Power announced inflation-busting increases in household bills, Fitzpatrick said he "cannot explain any of these price rises" as his company is buying gas for 7% less than it was two years ago.
    The four companies that have raised bills in recent weeks are under increasing pressure to justify their higher prices after figures from the regulator Ofgem showed that network costs have risen by just £15 since last year, wholesale costs by £10 and green costs by £10.
    During the hearing MPs criticised the companies' executives for accepting large bonuses while putting up prices year after year and failing in their duties to protect poor households who have to choose between heating and eating.
    John Robertson, a Labour MP, warned that thousands of people were dying of hypothermia because they could not afford to pay their bills. He dismissed the companies' claims that they do not disconnect customers by pointing out that those who fall into debt are moved on to prepayment meters which in effect force them to "self-disconnect". "The big reason is they die of hypothermia and they can't afford to keep the heating on. By the time you have gone to look for them [after 30 days of no energy] it's too late," he said.
    The four major companies that have raised prices blamed a combination of rising wholesale prices, green levies and network costs for their latest round of £100-plus increases, taking the average bill to £1,315 a year.
    They said they could cut prices per household by £40 to £60 instantly if the government removed a charge for the ECO – Energy Companies Obligation – scheme to help poorer households cut their energy usage, with E.ON calling it a "stealth poll tax" and SSE saying putting it on bills was "morally wrong".
    Tony Cocker, chief executive of E.ON, even called for a competition inquiry into the market to clear the energy firms of any allegations of profiteering once and for all. Cocker also said Labour's promise of a price freeze "at a stroke has increased the long-term cost of electricity and gas supply in this country".
    However, Ed Miliband, the Labour leader, dismissed the claims of the Big Six energy companies as excuses and said he would take action against those that are "overcharging people and taking advantage of a broken market" by freezing prices and breaking up the firms if he wins power in 2015.
    Fitzpatrick said he was "somewhat confused by looking at the explanations for the price rises over the past three or four weeks because we do not see really the same impact, especially in wholesale commodity prices.
    "We buy all of our power and gas on the wholesale market and … the most expensive price we have paid for wholesale gas in the last four years was in May 2011, for the following winter – that was 74p a therm.
    "Since then it has been below 72p a therm for this winter, last winter and next winter. We are buying gas for next winter at a current price of 69p a therm."
    He laid into RWE npower for being the "worst offender" in terms of offering some of the most expensive tariffs, and British Gas for its tactic of swiftly offering people much cheaper prices when they say they are about to switch supplier. He said the big companies could easily get round MPs' questions with "very complex, very clever, very confusing answers", adding: "You'll never get to the bottom of it."
    He added: "We are all trying to track were the money has gone, and you will never find it."
    Some of the big companies offer cheaper fixed-rate deals than Ovo and other small suppliers, but these are only taken up by a minority of savvy customers. Millions of British households are on the most expensive tariffs, which cost up to £150 more – or £3.7bn in total – than the prices that Ovo claims accurately reflect the costs of supplying energy with a 5% profit margin.
    Sitting next to representatives of E.ON, npower and SSE, Fitzpatrick said it was also "common practice among several of our competitors that they load the environmental and social obligation costs on to those customers that are less likely to leave. It looks to me like a lot of energy companies, a significant number of the Big Six, are charging the maximum price they feel they can get away with to the customers that they feel will not switch under any circumstances and then maintaining the illusion of competitive pricing with tariffs targeted towards a very small number of relatively well-engaged customers.
    "In the case of npower, which is the worst offender, historically and today the price differential is about 16%, which is about £200. That's more than the increase we have seen."
    Turning to his rivals' sales practices, Fitzpatrick complained that "one in five customers joining today are immediately leaving to go back to the previous supplier because of a win-back inducement that can be up to 15% off the bill".
    He said: "When a customer calls their supplier and says I'm going to leave, they say hold on a moment, we've just found out we can save you £160. British Gas seems to be the most active, with a dedicated win-back team whose sole job it is to call people up and there's a terrible mistake, we've been overcharging you all this time and now we can cut your bill. When this kind of behaviour is allowed to go unchallenged, this ex-monopoly advantage by the Big Six goes unchallenged by Ofgem, we'll never get effective competition."
    Andrew Wright, interim chief executive officer of Ofgem, said it was "absolutely right" that there should be a debate about its powers to regulate the industry and promised an annual competition review, but his evidence to MPs was cut short by a parliamentary vote in the Commons
  • Google and Yahoo furious at reports NSA secretly taps data centres


  • Google and Yahoo fury at NSA claim

    Google took down 5.3m "pirate" links in the first week of September 2013 - just under nine every second.
    Leaked files suggest agency can obtain information from cables connecting Google and Yahoo's data hubs


    Files obtained from Edward Snowden suggest NSA can collect information sent by fibre optic cable between Google and Yahoo data hubs 'at will'
    Google office
    Google said in a statement: 'We have long been concerned about the possibility of this kind of snooping.' Photograph: Walter Bieri/AP
    Google and Yahoo, two of the world's biggest tech companies, reacted angrily to a report on Wednesday that the National Security Agency has secretly intercepted the main communication links that carry their users' data around the world.
    Citing documents obtained from former NSA contractor Edward Snowden and interviews with officials, the Washington Post claimed the agency could collect information "at will" from among hundreds of millions of user accounts.
    The documents suggest that the NSA, in partnership with its British counterpart GCHQ, is copying large amounts of data as it flows across fiber-optic cables that carry information between the worldwide data centers of the Silicon Valley giants. The intelligence activities of the NSA outside the US are subject to fewer legal constraints than its domestic actions.
    The story is likely to put further strain on the already difficult relations between the tech firms and Washington. The internet giants are furious about the damage done to their reputation in the wake of Snowden's revelations.
    In a statement, Google's chief legal officer, David Drummond, said the company was "outraged" by the latest revelations.
    "We have long been concerned about the possibility of this kind of snooping, which is why we have continued to extend encryption across more and more Google services and links, especially the links in the slide," he said.
    "We do not provide any government, including the US government, with access to our systems. We are outraged at the lengths to which the government seems to have gone to intercept data from our private fiber networks, and it underscores the need for urgent reform."
    Yahoo said: "We have strict controls in place to protect the security of our data centers, and we have not given access to our data centers to the NSA or to any other government agency."
    According to a top-secret document cited by the Post dated 9 January 2013, millions of records a day are sent from Yahoo and Google internal networks to NSA data warehouses at the agency's headquarters in Fort Meade, Maryland. The types of information sent ranged from "metadata", indicating who sent or received emails, the subject line and where and when, to content such as text, audio and video.
    The Post's documents state that in the preceding 30 days, field collectors had processed and sent on 181,280,466 new records.
    Internet firms go to great lengths to protect their data. But the NSA documents published by the Post appear to boast about their ability to circumvent those protections. In one presentation slide on "Google Cloud Exploitation," published by the Post, an artist has added a smiley face, in apparent celebration of the NSA's victory over Google security systems.
    The Post said that the interception took place on the cables that connect the internet giants' data centers. The New York Times reported on Wednesday evening that one of the companies that provides such cables for Google was Level 3. It said in a statement provided to the Times: "We comply with the laws in each country where we operate. In general, governments that seek assistance in law enforcement or security investigations prohibit disclosure of the assistance provided."
    In its report, the Post suggested the intercept project was codenamed Muscular, but the Guardian understands from other documents provided by Snowden that the term instead refers to the system that enables the initial processing of information gathered from NSA or GCHQ cable taps.
    The data outputted from Muscular is then forwarded to NSA or GCHQ databases, or systems such as the XKeyscore search tool, previously reported by the Guardian.
    The Post said that by collecting the data overseas, the NSA was able to circumvent the legal restrictions that prevent it from accessing the communications of people who live in the United States, and that it fell instead under an executive order, signed by the president, that authorised foreign intelligence operations.
    In response, the NSA specifically denied that it used the presidential order to circumvent the restrictions on domestic spying, though the agency said nothing about the rest of the story.
    The NSA statement said, in full: "NSA has multiple authorities that it uses to accomplish its mission, which is centered on defending the nation. The Washington Post's assertion that we use Executive Order 12333 collection to get around the limitations imposed by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act and FAA 702 is not true.
    "The assertion that we collect vast quantities of US persons' data from this type of collection is also not true. NSA applies attorney general-approved processes to protect the privacy of US persons – minimizing the likelihood of their information in our targeting, collection, processing, exploitation, retention and dissemination.
    "NSA is a foreign intelligence agency. And we're focused on discovering and developing intelligence about valid foreign intelligence targets only."
    A GCHQ spokesman said: "We are aware of the story but we don't have any comment."
    The NSA statement was much more narrowly drawn than the initial response by the agency's director, General Keith Alexander. At a Washington conference on Wednesday as the Post story broke, Alexander issued an immediate denial, but was not specifically asked to address allegations that the NSA intercepted data transiting between the companies' data centers.
    The latest disclosures may shed new light on a reference in a GCHQ document, first reported in September by the Guardian, the New York Times and ProPublica. As part of its efforts with the NSA to defeat internet encryption, GCHQ, the 2012 document said, was working on developing ways into the major webmail providers, including Google and Yahoo. It added that "work has predominantly been focused this quarter on Google due to new access opportunities being developed".
    Other documents provided to the Guardian by Snowden suggest that GCHQ's work on Muscular, and a related tool called Incensor, is regarded as particularly valuable by the NSA, providing intelligence unavailable from other sources.
    "Muscular/Incensor has significantly enhanced the amount of benefit that the NSA derives from our special source access," one 2010 GCHQ document notes. It adds that this highlights "the unique contribution we are now making to NSA, providing insights into some of their highest priority targets".
    Relations between the tech companies and the government are already strained over the Snowden revelations. Speaking at a tech conference in September, Facebook co-founder Mark Zuckerberg said the government had done a "bad job" of balancing people's privacy. "Frankly, I think the government blew it," he said.
    Google will have its first turn before a legislative panel to confront surveillance questions next month. Senators Al Franken and Dean Heller, who are backing a bill to compel the government to provide more transparency about bulk surveillance, announced Wednesday that the Internet giant will send a representative to a Senate hearing they will hold on 13 November.
     Copy http://www.theguardian.com/
  • NSA infiltrates links to Yahoo, Google data centers worldwide, Snowden documents say


     

    NSA secretly taps Yahoo, Google data center links

    EXCLUSIVE | Snowden’s files show the NSA has positioned itself to collect from among hundreds of millions of users, many of them Americans.

    NSA taps Yahoo, Google data center links

    EXCLUSIVE | Edward Snowden’s files show the NSA has positioned itself to collect from among hundreds of millions of users, many of them Americans.
     

    NSA secretly taps Yahoo, Google data center links

    EXCLUSIVE | Snowden’s files show the NSA has positioned itself to collect from among hundreds of millions of users, many of them Americans.


    In this slide from a National Security Agency presentation on “Google Cloud Exploitation,” a sketch shows where the “Public Internet” meets the internal “Google Cloud” where user data resides. Two engineers with close ties to Google exploded in profanity when they saw the drawing.
    The National Security Agency has secretly broken into the main communications links that connect Yahoo and Google data centers around the world, according to documents obtained from former NSA contractor Edward Snowden and interviews with knowledgeable officials.
    By tapping those links, the agency has positioned itself to collect at will from hundreds of millions of user accounts, many of them belonging to Americans. The NSA does not keep everything it collects, but it keeps a lot.
    Graphic
    How the NSA is hacking private networks, such as Google’s
    Click Here to View Full Graphic Story
    How the NSA is hacking private networks, such as Google’s
    More on this story:

    How MUSCULAR collects too much data from Yahoo and Google

    How MUSCULAR collects too much data from Yahoo and Google
    This NSA document describes a common problem of collecting too much information – and how the agency is attempting to control it.

    Why the NSA wanted more access

    Why the NSA wanted more access
    The NSA already legally compelled tech companies to give it data via PRISM. So why did it hack into data links?

    Full coverage: NSA Secrets

    Full coverage: NSA Secrets
    Read all of the stories in The Washington Post’s ongoing coverage of the National Security Agency’s surveillance programs.
    Click here to subscribe.
    According to a top-secret accounting dated Jan. 9, 2013, the NSA’s acquisitions directorate sends millions of records every day from internal Yahoo and Google networks to data warehouses at the agency’s headquarters at Fort Meade, Md. In the preceding 30 days, the report said, field collectors had processed and sent back 181,280,466 new records — including “metadata,” which would indicate who sent or received e-mails and when, as well as content such as text, audio and video.
    The NSA’s principal tool to exploit the data links is a project called MUSCULAR, operated jointly with the agency’s British counterpart, the Government Communications Headquarters . From undisclosed interception points, the NSA and the GCHQ are copying entire data flows across fiber-optic cables that carry information among the data centers of the Silicon Valley giants.
    The infiltration is especially striking because the NSA, under a separate program known as PRISM, has front-door access to Google and Yahoo user accounts through a court-approved process.
    The MUSCULAR project appears to be an unusually aggressive use of NSA tradecraft against flagship American companies. The agency is built for high-tech spying, with a wide range of digital tools, but it has not been known to use them routinely against U.S. companies.
    In a statement, the NSA said it is “focused on discovering and developing intelligence about valid foreign intelligence targets only.”
    “NSA applies Attorney General-approved processes to protect the privacy of U.S. persons — minimizing the likelihood of their information in our targeting, collection, processing, exploitation, retention, and dissemination,” it said.
    In a statement, Google’s chief legal officer, David Drummond, said the company has “long been concerned about the possibility of this kind of snooping” and has not provided the government with access to its systems.
    “We are outraged at the lengths to which the government seems to have gone to intercept data from our private fiber networks, and it underscores the need for urgent reform,” he said.
    A Yahoo spokeswoman said, “We have strict controls in place to protect the security of our data centers, and we have not given access to our data centers to the NSA or to any other government agency.”
    Under PRISM, the NSA gathers huge volumes of online communications records by legally compelling U.S. technology companies, including Yahoo and Google, to turn over any data that match court-approved search terms. That program, which was first disclosed by The Washington Post and the Guardian newspaper in Britain, is authorized under Section 702 of the FISA Amendments Act and overseen by the Foreign ­Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC).
     Intercepting communications overseas has clear advantages for the NSA, with looser restrictions and less oversight. NSA documents about the effort refer directly to “full take,” “bulk access” and “high volume” operations on Yahoo and Google networks. Such large-scale collection of Internet content would be illegal in the United States, but the operations take place overseas, where the NSA is allowed to presume that anyone using a foreign data link is a foreigner.
    Outside U.S. territory, statutory restrictions on surveillance seldom apply and the FISC has no jurisdiction. Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) has acknowledged that Congress conducts little oversight of intelligence-gathering under the presidential authority of Executive Order 12333 , which defines the basic powers and responsibilities of the intelligence agencies.
    John Schindler, a former NSA chief analyst and frequent defender who teaches at the Naval War College, said it is obvious why the agency would prefer to avoid restrictions where it can.
    “Look, NSA has platoons of lawyers, and their entire job is figuring out how to stay within the law and maximize collection by exploiting every loophole,” he said. “It’s fair to say the rules are less restrictive under Executive Order 12333 than they are under FISA,” the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act.
    In a statement, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence denied that it was using executive authority to “get around the limitations” imposed by FISA.
    The operation to infiltrate data links exploits a fundamental weakness in systems architecture. To guard against data loss and system slowdowns, Google and Yahoo maintain fortresslike data centers across four continents and connect them with thousands of miles of fiber-optic cable. Data move seamlessly around these globe-spanning “cloud” networks, which represent billions of dollars of investment.
    For the data centers to operate effectively, they synchronize large volumes of information about account holders. Yahoo’s internal network, for example, sometimes transmits entire e-mail archives — years of messages and attachments — from one data center to another.
    Tapping the Google and Yahoo clouds allows the NSA to intercept communications in real time and to take “a retrospective look at target activity,” according to one internal NSA document.
    To obtain free access to data- center traffic, the NSA had to circumvent gold-standard security measures. Google “goes to great lengths to protect the data and intellectual property in these centers,” according to one of the company’s blog posts, with tightly audited access controls, heat-sensitive cameras, round-the-clock guards and biometric verification of identities.
    Google and Yahoo also pay for premium data links, designed to be faster, more reliable and more secure. In recent years, both of them are said to have bought
    or leased thousands of miles of fiber-optic cables for their own exclusive use. They had reason to think, insiders said, that their private, internal networks were safe from prying eyes.
     In an NSA presentation slide on “Google Cloud Exploitation,” however, a sketch shows where the “Public Internet” meets the internal “Google Cloud” where their data reside. In hand-printed letters, the drawing notes that encryption is “added and removed here!” The artist adds a smiley face, a cheeky celebration of victory over Google security.
    Two engineers with close ties to Google exploded in profanity when they saw the drawing. “I hope you publish this,” one of them said.
    For the MUSCULAR project, the GCHQ directs all intake into a “buffer” that can hold three to five days of traffic before recycling storage space. From the buffer, custom-built NSA tools unpack and decode the special data formats that the two companies use inside their clouds. Then the data are sent through a series of filters to “select” information the NSA wants and “defeat” what it does not. PowerPoint slides about the Google cloud, for example, show that the NSA tries to filter out all data from the company’s “Web crawler,” which indexes Internet pages.
    According to the briefing documents, prepared by participants in the MUSCULAR project, collection from inside Yahoo and Google has produced important intelligence leads against hostile foreign governments that are specified in the documents.
    Last month, long before The Post approached Google to discuss the penetration of its cloud, Eric Grosse, vice president for security engineering, said the company is rushing to encrypt the links between its data centers. “It’s an arms race,” he said then. “We see these government agencies as among the most skilled players in this game.”
    Yahoo has not announced plans to encrypt its data-center links.
    Because digital communications and cloud storage do not usually adhere to national boundaries, MUSCULAR and a previously disclosed NSA operation to collect Internet address books have amassed content and metadata on a previously unknown scale from U.S. citizens and residents. Those operations have gone undebated in public or in Congress because their existence was classified.
    The Google and Yahoo operations call attention to an asymmetry in U.S. surveillance law. Although Congress has lifted some restrictions on NSA domestic surveillance on grounds that purely foreign communications sometimes pass over U.S. switches and cables, it has not added restrictions overseas, where American communications or data stores now cross over foreign switches.
    “Thirty-five years ago, different countries had their own telecommunications infrastructure, so the division between foreign and domestic collection was clear,” Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), a member of the intelligence panel, said in an interview. “Today there’s a global communications infrastructure, so there’s a greater risk of collecting on Americans when the NSA collects overseas.”
    It is not clear how much data from Americans is collected and how much of that is retained. One weekly report on MUSCULAR says the British operators of the site allow the NSA to contribute 100,000 “selectors,” or search terms. That is more than twice the number in use in the PRISM program, but even 100,000 cannot easily account for the millions of records that are said to be sent to Fort Meade each day.
    In 2011, when the FISC learned that the NSA was using similar methods to collect and analyze data streams — on a much smaller scale — from cables on U.S. territory, Judge John D. Bates ruled that the program was illegal under FISA and inconsistent with the requirements of the Fourth Amendment.
    copy  http://www.washingtonpost.com/

    Live Blog: Wednesday's Hearing on HealthCare.gov Problems

    Sebelius: "I am as frustrated and angry as anyone." (Melina Mara/Post)

    1. Wall Street Journal (blog)
      The Obama administration's top health official, Kathleen Sebelius, on Wednesday is expected to blame contractors for some of the problems ...

      Live Blog: Wednesday’s Hearing on HealthCare.gov Problems

      The Obama administration’s top health official, Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius, on Wednesday in testimony before a House committee is expected to blame contractors for some of the problems with the federal health-insurance website, HealthCare.gov, and to defend herself against calls that she resign. The hearing started at 9 a.m.
      • Rep. Bruce Braley (D., Iowa) asks how committed Sebelius is to having the website fully functioning by Dec. 1. She says that she has committed to that date because that’s been the assessment of the team of tech experts which examined the site and made up a long list of problems that must be fixed.
        There’s no confidence in that date “until we deliver on that date,” Sebelius says. “And that’s on me.”
      • “We intend to invite them back,” she said, but noted that won’t be happening until the website is working well. “We don’t want to do that until we are confidenct that they will have a different experience.”
      • Secretary Sebelius acknowledges that there is going to have to be an effort to convince early, frustrated shoppers to come back to HealthCare.gov and sign up for insurance. In particular, the administration is going to target younger, healthy people to sign up since they’re needed to help cover the costs of older, sicker people who are more likely to brave the website to get coverage.
      • Under questioning from Republican Rep. Steve Scalise of Louisiana, Sebelius reiterates that CMS chief Tavenner made the decision to disable the anonymous browsing feature on HealthCare.gov (which has since been restored).
        “I did not make the decision,” Sebelius said.
      • Sebelius says “I don’t know” if an individual can currently apply for a hardship exemption from the individual mandate on HealthCare.gov, in response to a question from Republican Rep. Phil Gingrey of Georgia. He says that people can’t because the administration still hasn’t finalized the form people need to fill out to claim the exemption.
      • At a September hearing ahead of the launch, Mr. Cohen said:  "We may encounter some bumps when open enrollment begins but we'll solve them." Read the full story from Sept. 19: "Pricing Glitch Afflicts Rollout of Online Health Exhanges"
      • Statement from Mitt Romney released amid hearing: "In the years since the Massachusetts health care law went into effect nothing has changed my view that a plan crafted to fit the unique circumstances of a single state should not be grafted onto the entire country. Beyond that, had President Obama actually learned the lessons of Massachusetts health care, millions of Americans would not lose the insurance they were promised they could keep, millions more would not see their premiums skyrocket, and the installation of the program would not have been a frustrating embarrassment."
      • Sebelius said that she asked Jeffrey Zients to take over the cleanup process. Asked by Rep. Michael Burgess (R., Texas) if she’ll make him available for questioning by the committee, Sebelius doesn’t say she will. She says “he is volunteering his services to us for a time.”
      • Democratic Rep. G.K. Butterfield of North Carolina wants to make sure that everyone knows what the House Energy and Commerce Twitter handle is. He puts up a little sign next to his name plate. It’s @energycommerce. Follow them now, OK?
      • Republican Rep. Tim Murphy of Pennsylvania asks whether Sebelius knows how many people will receive cancellation notices from insurers who will be phasing out current insurance policies as of November 1.
        She doesn’t. Sebelius notes that there are about 12 million people who buy insurance in the individual insurance market. Some of those people have plans that are grandfathered in under the new law, but others don’t. It’s the people in the latter category who are getting those cancellation notices in the mail.
      • After laughing about the "faux anger" of Republicans about the website's problems, Democrat Mike Doyle of Pennsylvania asks about enrollment. Sebelius said that they always thought that they would have pretty low enrollment in the first month because that's what happened in Massachusetts a few years ago when they launched a similar insurance program.
        But given the "flawed" launch of HealthCare.gov, there's no question "it will be a very small number," she said.
      • Republican Mike Rogers of Michigan raises concerns about security testing of the site on all of the new or revised software code that is being used to patch the site to fix it. For the most part, Sebelius can’t really answer his questions but says she’ll get back to him.
        He asks if she’ll take down the site so a full security test to be completed. “No sir,” Sebelius said, adding that there is daily and weekly security monitoring of the site. 
      • Sebelius tells Republican Rep. Lee Terry of Nebraska that there’s a good reason why the administration hasn’t released enrollment data yet. “We don’t have any reliable data on enrollment, which is why we haven’t released it to date,” she said. The only number they have released is that 700,000 nationally have finished the process of finding out whether they are eligible for subsidies.
        “The system isn’t functioning so we’re not getting reliable data,” she said.
      • Democratic Rep. Diana DeGette of Colorado asks about the contractors and whether they shared their concerns that the site wouldn't be ready on Oct. 1. Sebelius says that the contractors said in September they were ready to go and as they noted last week in last's weeks hearing that they did not suggest that the site should be delayed.
        "I don't think it's valuable at this point (to be) pointing blame," Sebelius said. (She may be in the minority on this one.) Sebelius said she's focused on getting the health exchange up and running properly.
      • Republican Rep. Greg Walden of Oregon, asks about testing and whether there was enough of it before HealthCare.gov went live. Last week, contractors at another hearing complained that there wasn't enough end-to-end testing of the system. So while individual parts of the website worked, when they were put together, things didn't work that well.
        "We did not adequately do end-to-end testing," Sebelius said. "The products weren’t locked and loaded into the system until the third week of September."
      • Democratic Rep. Gene Green of Texas asks about the cancellation issue, albeit in a much more positive way than his Republican colleauges.
        Sebelius notes that individuals have always had a harder time trying to buy insurance on the individual market but that is easier now under the new health law. Plans have to cover more conditions and people can’t be denied coverage because of preexisting conditons.
        “This market has always been the Wild West,” Sebelius said. “They have choices they’ve never had before.”
      • Republican Rep. Joe Pitts of Pennsylvania asks who made the decision to turn off the browsing feature on HealthCare.gov. Sebelius said that she was aware “we were paring back features” of the site. She said that CMS administrator Marilyn Tavenner made the decision to dial back several planned features of the site, including the “shop and browse” feature as well as the Spanish-language version of the site.
        Eliminating the anonymous shopping feature of the site led to many of the early problems with HealthCare.gov, because people had to sign up for accounts to look at rates. High volumes of people trying to create accounts crashed that part of the site.
      • Democrat Rep. Eliot Engel of New York compares Republicans at the hearing to Chicken Little, running around claiming that the sky is falling. He asks how the tactics of Republicans to try to impede or delay the law have affected efforts to roll out the law.
        Sebelius says that people need a lot of information about how the law will affect them, which is why she is “so disappointed the site isn’t fully functioning.”
        “It is the law and people have benefits and rights under that law so they can make good choices for themselves,” she said.
      • Eshoo also asked about the contracts and whether it was possible to assess any penalty against the two main contractors, QSSI and CGI, for building a website and underlying technology that didn't work particularly well.
        "We expect our contract partners to fulfill their obligations," Sebelius said.
        Notably, she said that while there isn't a built-in penalty in the contract, "paying for work that isn't complete isn't something we'll do," she said. HHS officials haven't previously talked publicly about financially penalizing the contractors.
      • Rep. Anna Eshoo, a Democrat whose California congressional district includes parts of Silicon Valley, notes that HHS officials had previously expressed confidence that the site would work on Oct. 1. Now that date had been pushed back to Nov. 30. Did Sebelius have confidence in the new date?
        "The assessment we have made is that it will take the end of November for an optimally preforming website," Sebelius said. "I have confidence, but I know that it isn’t fair to ask the American people to take our word on it."
      • Rep. Ralph Hall (R., Texas) asks another question about how much the administration has been spending on the site, including repairs.
        Sebelius doesn’t provide a clear answer on that. She says that the two major contractors, QSSI – a unit of UnitedHealth Group – and CGI Federal have contracts with obligated funds through at least 2014. So far, CGI has received $104 million of a $197 million contract.
        Hall cuts her off with a totally unrelated comment asking her where she was born in Kansas (she was born in Ohio) so we don’t get any more details about the QSSI contract.
      • Rep. Frank Pallone (D., N.J.) says the uproar about the cancellation of insurance policies is a "red herring" and that there's no there there. "Insurance companies are canceling lousy policies with high prices," Pallone says.
        • 10:44 am
        • Add a Comment
        Some more details on Michelle Snyder, from our story Monday: At CMS, in one camp were computer experts reporting to a veteran CMS official, Michelle Snyder, who were among the first to recognize the scale of the problems facing the website, current and former officials say, such as errors in the calculation of insurance prices and eligibility determinations. But a separate policy arm built the road map for what the exchange needed to accomplish, with strained communication with its computer counterparts; that team reported to Gary Cohen, a former California lawyer.
      • Barton goes back to questioning on some privacy issues that he brought up last week with the contractors. It's about some language in the source code of the website that seems to suggest applicants information may not be protected and can be shared.
        Sebelius says that the language on the site shouldn't be there and will be removed. "I do absolutely commit to protecting the privacy of the American people," she said.
      • After the somewhat tortured Wizard of Oz reference ( Sebelius was previously the governor of Kansas), Barton says there seems to be a parallel universe at the hearing, with Democrats thinking  "things are great," while Republicans disagree.
      • Rep. Joe Barton (R., Texas) tells Sebelius, who is from Kansas, "We're not in Kansas anymore. Some might say we're in the Wizard of Oz land."
      • Rep. Blackburn wants to know who was responsible for the failed website. After some back and forth, Sebelius says that Michelle Snyder, chief operating officer of CMS.
        “Michelle Synder was responsible for the debacle?” Blackburn says?
        “Michelle Synder was not responsible for the debacle,” Sebelius says, adding: "Hold me accountable for the debacle. I'm responsible."
      • Rep. Blackburn asked if Obama is keeping his promise to let consumers keep their insurance plans if they like them. Sebelius: “Yes, he is.”
      • How much has HealthCare.gov cost so far, asks Rep. Marsha Blackburn (R., Tenn.)?
        “So far we have spent about $118 million on the website itself,” Sebelius says. They’ve spent another $56 million on other technology to support the website. 
      • Waxman tosses a few softball questions at Sebelius that allows her to talk about the individual insurance market and how the health law provides new protections that people who buy private insurance have never had before. That includes the end of dening coverage for pre-existing conditions. 
      • Sebelius faces an uphill battle as cancellation notices go out to many Americans. On Wednesday, Washington Post fact checker Glenn Kessler gave Obama's pledge that "no one will take away" your health plan four Pinocchios.
        copy  http://blogs.wsj.com/

    Postagem em destaque

    Ao Planalto, deputados criticam proposta de Guedes e veem drible no teto com mudança no Fundeb Governo quer que parte do aumento na participação da União no Fundeb seja destinada à transferência direta de renda para famílias pobres

    Para ajudar a educação, Políticos e quem recebe salários altos irão doar 30% do soldo que recebem mensalmente, até o Governo Federal ter f...