House Republicans to propose one-year delay of Obamacare


BREAKING NEWS
House to propose Obamacare delay
House Republican leaders are expected to propose a new plan to the GOP rank-and-file on Saturday afternoon: make a new gesture of defiance toward President Obama’s health-care law, even if it increases the chances of a government shutdown on Monday night.
As the House GOP met for an internal conference Saturday in the Capitol basement, this was the plan leadership was expected to present: amend a Senate-passed bill to keep federal agencies open until November 15, and add a new portion that would delay all elements of the health-care law for a year.
More from PostPolitics

John Boehner, back under pressure

John Boehner, back under pressure
Boehner has at least three crucial decisions to make heading into a pivotal weekend.

A guide to Obamacare claims

A guide to Obamacare claims
Confused by the claims about Obamacare? Check out our handy guide to the rhetoric.

Sign up for ‘The Showdown’ newsletter

Sign up for ‘The Showdown’ newsletter
Get the latest news on the budget fight and a possible government shutdown in this daily newsletter.

Implementing Obamacare

Implementing Obamacare
LATEST UPDATES | What you need to know about the new health-care law as it begins to take effect.
According to a Republican inside the room, leaders are advocating an aggressive approach but trying to put in a few sweeteners to deal with the fallout of when the government shuts down. The package includes a one year delay of all elements of the health law, a permanent repeal of the medical sales device tax that funded portions of the law and a proviso that would assure pay for the military.
Additionally, the GOP has moved the date for federal funding back to Dec. 15.
The advantage of that plan--for Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) and his team--is political. This idea would be even more aggressive than their last legislative attack on the law. That one would only have stripped some funding from the law’s implementation. This one would stop the law itself, at least temporarily.
The disadvantage is more practical: it would make a shutdown far more likely.
This plan would have to pass the Democrat-held Senate, and be signed by President Obama. And it probably won’t. So approving it would only heighten the chances that no spending bill will be passed before the next fiscal year begins on Tuesday, October 1.
Before the meeting began, it was clear that senior Republicans understood these possible consequences. Some rank-and-file Republicans said they now saw no way out of the shutdown.
Rep. Tom Rooney (R-Fla.) said a shutdown was now “likely.”
“What’s going on that would make you think otherwise? Maybe I’ll hear something in there that will change that,” he said before going into the GOP meeting. “I doubt it.”
The House is expected to vote Saturday on some kind of funding resolution. But it’s still not clear what the resolution will say.
Even before the meeting began, some Republicans said they were very wary of any plan that would cause a significant shutdown.
“I don’t think we should skip a payday for our troops,” said Howard P. “Buck” McKeon (R-Calif.), the chair of House Armed Services committee.
Asked if it was acceptable that military pay would be at risk in a government shutdown, McKeon responded “I’m only one person - I can only do what I can do.”
Before the meeting of the entire House Republican Conference, Boehner gathered his leadership team in his second floor Capitol office to go over the GOP’s final options. Aides said the Republicans were still considering all their alternatives and were searching for maneuvers that could walk an incredibly fine line – appeasing a bloc of 30 or more far-right conservatives who are demanding an aggressive posture against Obamacare, and also finding something that could be acceptable to Senate Democrats.At this stage Boehner and his top lieutenants, Majority Leader Eric I. Cantor (R-Va.) and Majority Whip Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.), are refusing to entertain the prospect of seeking out Democratic votes to keep the government open, according to advisers who spoke requesting anonymity to discuss the closed-door talks.
The rare Saturday session followed the Senate’s passage on Friday of a stopgap government funding bill and promptly departed, leaving all of the pressure to find a solution on House Republican leaders.

On Saturday, as this drama played out on Capitol Hill, President Obama played golf at Fort Belvoir in Virginia.
The day before, Obama had sternly lecturing GOP leaders that the easiest path forward would be to approve the Senate’s bill, which includes money for the implementation of the Affordable Care Act, the president’s prized legislation achievement, which he signed into law in 2010.
But a far-right bloc of House and Senate Republicans banded together to leave House Speaker John A. Boehner (R-Ohio) virtually powerless to act.
“My message to Congress is this: Do not shut down the government. Do not shut down the economy. Pass a budget on time,” Obama said in the White House press briefing room.
With a stroke-of-midnight deadline Monday, Senate Majority Leader Harry M. Reid (D-Nev.) said Democrats would reject any conservative add-ons that Boehner might attach to the funding bill. That would further delay passage, and given the staunch opposition from Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Tex.), who has suggested that he will not help move the process along, the slow-moving Senate would require up to a week to approve something even if Reid were amenable to the changes. That sets the stage for a shutdown Tuesday.
“We’ve passed the only bill that can avert a government shutdown Monday night. I said this on the floor, I say it again: This is it, time is gone,” Reid said Friday after the midday passage of the funding bill on a party-line vote.
Before that final roll call, Cruz’s attempt to filibuster the legislation was throttled in a bipartisan 79-to-19 vote, but the first-year senator drew support from nearly half the rank-and-file Republicans in defiance of Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.).
Cruz confirmed reports that he has been huddling with House conservatives to help plot their strategy to force Boehner’s hand on Obamacare. “I am confident if the House listens to the people, as it did last week, that it will continue to step forward and respond to the suffering that is coming from Obamacare,” Cruz told reporters Friday, saying he has had “numerous conversations” with House Republicans.
Those Republicans upended a strategy crafted by Boehner and House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-Va.) to first advance legislation related to the federal borrowing limit, including more demands to delay Obamacare, then allow government funding to be approved.
That plan required the GOP leaders to draw all votes from their side of the aisle — 217 of the 232 Republicans — and instead the Cruz-backed contingent hold more than enough votes to sabotage any moves by Boehner and Cantor. Those House Republicans offered their version late Friday of what they want attached to the funding resolution and sent back to the Senate: an amendment delaying until 2015 implementation of all the health law’s taxes, mandates and benefits as well as its provisions aimed at squeezing savings from Medicare.
 “A simple and reasonable way to ensure fairness for all is to provide every American the same one-year Obamacare delay that President Obama provided for businesses and others,” Rep. Tom Graves (R-Ga.), the bill’s author, said in a written statement.
He has more than 60 co-sponsors.

While the health-care law has had some provisions delayed amid a wobbly rollout, Obama and Democrats oppose any effort to strip funding or delay implementation of the law as it begins a critical new period next week. The president warned that demands to delay Obamacare were even more reckless in connection with the raising debt limit, because the Treasury will run out of maneuvers to continue borrowing Oct. 17 and will head toward a first-of-its-kind default on the nearly $17 trillion debt. Economists have warned that a default would send a shock through global financial markets and would jolt interest rates.
“I don’t know how I can be more clear about this: Nobody gets to threaten the full faith and credit of the United States just to extract political concessions,” Obama said Friday.
Meanwhile, House leaders delayed consideration of their initial proposal to raise the federal debt limit until at least next week.
It was unclear Friday whether the debt-limit bill would require additional surgery, senior GOP aides said, since most of those who objected to the measure were concerned primarily about timing. However, a separate bloc of lawmakers complained that the bill — a grab bag of conservative agenda items ranging from tax reform to the rollback of environmental regulations — would do too little to cut spending. As written, the measure contained only around $200 billion in spending cuts over the next decade. Meanwhile it would suspend the debt limit through Dec. 5, 2014, permitting the Treasury Department to borrow an additional $1 trillion.
The bill has no hope of passing the Democratic-controlled Senate.
After a few noncontroversial votes naming federal buildings, the House adjourned Friday morning amid deep uncertainty about its next steps. Boehner and Cantor have called a noon Saturday caucus meeting in the Capitol basement to try to forge ahead.
For the moment, GOP leaders have given no indication they were willing to simply approve the Senate legislation. Such a move, some Republicans privately fear, could lead to a collapse of support among GOP lawmakers and result in the legislation passing largely on the strength of Democratic votes. That would leave Boehner, already the weakest speaker of the modern political era, even more politically wounded heading into the debt ceiling talks.
Several Republicans said Friday that they favor a “stick” approach — an amendment so distasteful to Democrats that they might feel compelled to return to the negotiating table. Others favor a “carrot” approach, attaching an item Democrats would find hard to refuse — including possibly delaying sequestration cuts for a year in exchange for delaying implementation of Obamacare for a year. They did not detail the specifics of either approach.
 However, with Graves holding potentially several dozen votes, no Republican could offer a sound explanation for how they would avert a shutdown next week.
Before the Senate votes, Reid denounced as “anarchists” the Cruz-led Republicans who he said were driving the country toward economic devastation.

“Today the Republican Party has been infected by a small destructive faction,” Reid said. “These extremists are more interested in putting on a show, as one Republican colleague put it, than legislating.”
The situation is in such flux that some of the most strident conservatives cast votes to filibuster the government funding bill — effectively endorsing shutting down the government — and yet immediately after warned it would not succeed in hindering the health law.
“Obamacare will continue. America’s going to have to judge whether it’s a good thing or bad thing. I still think Obamacare is going to be bad for part-time workers, for workers who may lose their insurance. I think it’s bad for the country,” said Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.), a leading contender for his party’s 2016 presidential nomination.
He suggested that the fight against Obamacare had been lost for now and that the GOP should move on to other issues.
One veteran of the mid-1990s shutdowns, which also pitted a Democratic president against a Republican speaker, warned a temporary shutdown was increasingly likely.
“It depends if wisdom trumps energy. It hasn’t thus far, has it?” Sen. Tom Coburn (R-Okla.) said, a dig at those who want to continue the campaign against Obamacare.
Coburn, a freshman House member in the 1990s shutdowns, said it wouldn’t matter much until Oct. 15. That’s when the first paychecks for service members — including those on the front lines of Afghanistan — would not go out.
“When you start getting into military pay, that’s serious. When the people defending this country can’t pay their house payments, things they need to do. . . . We’ll fold like hot cakes if they shut down. Republicans will,” Coburn predicted.
copy  http://www.washingtonpost.com/

Nenhum comentário:

Postar um comentário

Postagem em destaque

Ao Planalto, deputados criticam proposta de Guedes e veem drible no teto com mudança no Fundeb Governo quer que parte do aumento na participação da União no Fundeb seja destinada à transferência direta de renda para famílias pobres

Para ajudar a educação, Políticos e quem recebe salários altos irão doar 30% do soldo que recebem mensalmente, até o Governo Federal ter f...