Local election results 2014 – Friday 23 May


  • Ukip leader Nigel Farage

    Ukip delivers first tremors of political earthquake

    Nigel Farage weakens Labour's grip in north as Tories lose control of flagship councils and Lib Dem vote collapses

    Follow the 2014 local elections results live as more than 4,000 councillors are elected in England across metropolitan boroughs, unitary authorities, non-metropolitan districts and in every seat in every London borough. Figures are updated after overall council results are announced
    Welcome to our second local election results live blog.
    My colleague Claire Phipps has just finished the overnight results blog which you can read here.
    We've had more than a third of the results in so far, and it is already clear that Ukip is doing very well. The Conservatives have lost control of several councils as a result of the Ukip advance. And the Ukip surge has also hit Labour, which has been picking up seats, but perhaps fewer than expected, and which has lost control of Thurrock following Ukip gains there. The Lib Dems are doing particularly badly.
    Here are some of the results in detail. I've taken the information from the Press Association.
    • Ukip have gained 11 seats in Basildon, Essex, meaning the Conservatives lost control of the council.
    • Ukip gained five seats in Thurrock, Essex, meaning that Labour lost control of the council.
    • The Conservatives lost control in Southend-on-Sea after a Ukip surge saw them gain five seats.
    • The Tories lost control of Tamworth in Staffordshire, where no party now has overall control.
    • The Lib Dems have lost control of Portsmouth.
    • Ukip won four seats in Maidstone in Kent, costing the Conservatives control of the council.
    • Labour has claimed it has seized control of "David Cameron's favourite council" - Tory-run Hammersmith and Fulham.
    • The Conservatives lost four seats in Peterborough, which meant they lost overall control of the council.
    • The Conservatives have lost control of Brentwood in Essex.
    • The Conservatives have lost control of Castle Point, which covers Canvey Island in Essex, following Ukip gains.
    • Mike Hancock, the MP elected as a Lib Dem who now sits as an independent, has lost his council seat in Portsmouth.
    Updated
    Council staff counting votes from the local elections in Croydon.
    Council staff counting votes from the local elections in Croydon. Photograph: Rob Stothard/Getty Images
    Before my colleague Claire Phipps handed over the live blog baton, she posted a final round up on her overnight results blog. Here it is.
    Things are still very fluid, with 49 councils declared so far, but there are some trends and highlights to flag:
    Labour has won Hammersmith and Fulham, a flagship Tory council. The Conservatives also lost Brentwood, home of Eric Pickles.
    Ukip's share of the vote has surged, affecting the results in a number of councils. The Conservatives lost control of several authorities after Ukip swiped high numbers of seats. Ukip has become the official opposition in Rotherham, where it took 10 seats. In Basildon, it took 11.
    The Lib Dems lost Portsmouth council to no overall control. Ukip took six seats there. MP and former Lib Dem Mike Hancock also lost his council seat in Fratton.

    Local elections - what the experts predicted

    It is already clear that Ukip have outperformed expectations.
    Official predictions from the political parties tend to be fairly unhelpful, because they are mainly designed to manage expectations. The Conservatives and the Lib Dems were saying earlier this week that they expected to lose seats, and Labour claimed they were only expecting to gain around 150 seats. But polling experts do produce more objective figures, based on how well the parties are doing in the polls, and I'm aware of two different “forecasts”.

    Rallings/Thrasher

    Colin Rallings and Michael Thrasher are professors of politics at University of Plymouth who specialise in studying local elections. In a briefing for the Political Studies Association last month, they produced some figures for the number of seats they expect the main parties to win in these local elections based on how well they have been performing over the last three months in local council byelections.
    According to Rawlings and Thrasher, those byelections suggest produce following national equivalent vote (NEV). NEV is what the national vote share would be if the results in places that did vote were replicated in wards all over the country.
    Labour: 33%
    Conservatives: 30%
    Ukip: 16%
    Lib Dems: 14%
    According to Rallings and Thrasher, a strict application of this NEV would see Labour gain 500 seats, the Lib Dems lose 340, and the Conservatives lose 160. And Ukip would not win a single seat. But they recognise that it is hard to assess Ukip, because they are a relatively new party that has only started winning council seats, and so they revised their figures to take into account the likelihood they would win some seats. Here are the figures they presented to the PSA.
    Labour: +490 seats
    Ukip: +80
    Conservatives: -220
    Lib Dems: -350
    As I write, Ukip has already hit 80 seats - and around half the results are yet to come in.

    Fisher

    Steve Fisher is an associate politics professor at Oxford. He has got his own forecasting model, based on the link between performance in local elections and performance in national opinion polls. He explains it here on his blog. And here are his figures.
    Labour: +130 (in a range between +30 and +220)
    Conservatives: -130 (in a range between -30 and -235)
    Lib Dems: -400 (in a range between -230 and -570)
    He does not have a figure for Ukip because his model does not cover it yet.
    Directly elected mayors have gone out of favour, but in Copeland they have voted for one.
    Labour has held Carlisle city council (where only a third of wards were up for election).
    Ukip have been celebrating in Portsmouth, where the Lib Dems have lost control because of Ukip gains. Only a third of seats were up for election.
    Labour has taken control of Cambridge.
    Jacob Rees-Mogg, the Conservative MP, has renewed his call for some kind of Conservative/Ukip pact in the light of these results.
    Graham Stringer, the Labour MP for Blackley and Broughton, has been speaking to broadcasters. He criticised the Labour campaign, saying that although the party was campaigning on the cost of living, Ed Miliband did not even know his own cost of living. That was "unforgivably unprofessional", he said.
    Lynne Featherstone, the Lib Dem international development minister, has said that Ukip are doing well because they "sound like human beings".
    The reason have had such amazing success, such a rapid rise ... I think they've also managed to sound like human beings, and I think that's Nigel Farage's big win. All of us have gotten to the point where we are so guarded, we are so on message, that we seem to have lost some of our humanity.
    As James Forsyth reports in this Spectator article, Nigel Farage thinks much the same.
    Farage thinks the secret of his success is simple. ‘It’s about language, isn’t it? I’m fairly direct and I think that makes a big difference.’
    Here's more on the Cambridge, where Labour took control of a council that was previously under no overall control. It's from the Press Association.
    Ten of the seats on offer went to Labour, while the Lib Dems won four and an independent one.
    The new council line-up has Labour on 25, the Lib Dems on 14, independents on two and Conservatives on one.
    According to this list compiled by Lewis Baston for Progress (pdf), Cambridge (a Lib Dem seat) is 103rd on Labour's list of general election targets.

    Labour doing less well than two years ago, says John Curtice

    On the Today programme John Curtice, the psephologist, delivered his preliminary verdict on the results. Here are the key points.
    • Curtice said that Labour were doing worse than they were two years ago.
    When it comes to local elections, we have quite high expectations of what oppositions should achieve because we basically say, if a party looks as though it is potentially regarded as an alternative government, it should be doing very well in local elections, even better than you would expect to do in a general election in 12 months' time. The truth is, by that test at least, Labour have not done well enough.
    Most of the seats that were being up for grabs yesterday were last fought over on the same day as the 2010 general election. And if you compare Labour's performance vote for vote with 2010, the advance is just 3% point - 3% on what was the day in which Labour recorded its second worst result. And if you actually compare these results with the position two years ago, which we can also compare most of these places with, Labour's vote is clearly well down, something like nine points.
    So the truth is, modest progress, Labour not even doing as well as they were able to do earlier in this parliament, and thereby again reinforcing the doubts that have always been there that at the end of the day it is not entirely clear that the British electorate regard Labour as a clear alternative.
    • He said Ukip were doing much better than expected.
    Certainly what these local elections demonstrate is that anybody who thought that the Ukip bubble was going to be easily deflated should now be disabused of that notion. They have managed to maintain most of the support they have had over the last 12 months and repeated it at these local elections. To that extent at least they have done remarkably well.
    We have already found Ukip gaining over 80 seats. That was as much as anybody expected them to make [see 6.01am], even if they did well, and we've only had a third or so of the results actually in yet. So we are probably going to see far more Ukip councils by the time all the ballots are counted this afternoon than we've ever previously seen.
    • He said on average Ukip were getting just under 25% of the vote. In London they were only getting around 7% of the vote, he said. But outside London they were getting more than 25%.
    Here's Greg Hands, the Conservative deputy chief whip and MP for Chelsea and Fulham, on the Hammersmith and Fulham result.
    The Tories used to run the council, but 11 of their wards went to Labour, leaving the council with 26 Labour seats and 20 Conservative.
    My colleague Rob Booth has sent me this from Croydon.
    UKIP's vote is showing strongly even if they've not won seats yet in Croydon. They just came second to the Conservatives in the safe ward of Kenley, an affluent leafy suburb and their candidate came third behind the two Labour winners in Fieldway ward.
    For more on Croydon, try the Croydon Citizen's live blog.
    John Curtice's comments on the BBC earlier (see 6.39am) suggest he thinks Labour is on course for a projected national share (PNS) of 30%.
    PNS is a figure that psephologists produce that tries to show what the national result would have been if the votes in local elections had been replicated in an election covering every ward in the country. It adjusts the actual results to take into account the fact that annual local elections feature a disproportionate number of elections in either Tory or Labour areas.
    In 2010 Labour's PNS in the local elections was 27%. In 2012 it was 38%.
    There is some good news for the Lib Dems.
    Here's Steve Crowther, the Ukip chairman, on the results.
    They are saying [Ukip is just a protest vote] but there is an air of desperation about it to be perfectly honest because this has now been going on for sometime and it's a consistent thing.
    Ukip have been building for 20 years consistently and we have now reached a point where we have broken into the old party system. It is now four party politics and this is not a flash in the pan.
    The other parties are looking a little bit panic stricken.
    He said he was particularly pleased the party had won 10 seats in Rotherham.
    The Conservative MP Jacob Rees-Mogg has been renewing his call for some kind of Conservative/Ukip pact. Grant Shapps, the party chairman, has ruled that out.
    We’re not going to have a pact or joint candidates, or whatever. It can’t happen on a technical basis because we do not allow joint candidates to stand ... It’s not going to happen because we’re the Conservative party; we are the best chance to offer an in/out referendum, the only chance.
  • Nenhum comentário:

    Postar um comentário

    Postagem em destaque

    Ao Planalto, deputados criticam proposta de Guedes e veem drible no teto com mudança no Fundeb Governo quer que parte do aumento na participação da União no Fundeb seja destinada à transferência direta de renda para famílias pobres

    Para ajudar a educação, Políticos e quem recebe salários altos irão doar 30% do soldo que recebem mensalmente, até o Governo Federal ter f...