24 September 2012
Last updated at 15:47 GMT
No 10 backs police row minister
Downing Street defends minister Andrew Mitchell, but his apology
fails to impress the Police Federation, Labour and some senior Lib
Dems.
Andrew Mitchell gets No 10 backing after police row apology
Andrew Mitchell: "I did not use the words that have been attributed to me"
David
Cameron has full confidence in Andrew Mitchell and said he had taken
the "correct action" in apologising for his outburst at police, says No
10.
The chief whip told reporters he was sorry for not showing
enough respect to the police, but maintained that he "did not use the
words attributed to me".He said he wanted to "draw a line" under last Wednesday's incident.
The Police Federation and Labour both want an inquiry, while some Lib Dems were unimpressed by the statement.
Mr Mitchell is reported to have sworn at an officer during the incident on Wednesday evening - when police directed him away from the main gate to a smaller pedestrian gate - and said "learn your place" and "you don't run this government".
'Discourteous' In his first statement to reporters about the incident, on Monday morning, Mr Mitchell said that the incident had come at the end of a "long and extremely frustrating day".
Continue reading the main story
After four days of damaging headlines, Mr Mitchell arrived not on his bike but in a slightly beaten-up purple VW. He was calm and perhaps a little contrite, reiterating his apology to the police and saying it had been accepted by the officer concerned.
Again he denied using the words attributed to him, although it was not clear whether that included the politically explosive "pleb", reported in the Sun newspaper.
It had been, said Mr Mitchell, "a long and extremely frustrating day", though this was no excuse.
Having been told by officials last week that Mr Mitchell had not sworn at the police, it's now clear he did, although which words were actually used, we still do not know.
He could well do without some Lib Dem ministerial colleagues such as Home Office minister Jeremy Browne telling the BBC that there were still loose ends to tie up on the matter.
But they will be quietly hopeful in Downing Street that nothing has really emerged to undermine Mr Mitchell's basic account of last Wednesday's fracas.
Analysis
In the Whitehall drizzle shortly after eight o'clock this morning, Andrew Mitchell attempted to clear the air.After four days of damaging headlines, Mr Mitchell arrived not on his bike but in a slightly beaten-up purple VW. He was calm and perhaps a little contrite, reiterating his apology to the police and saying it had been accepted by the officer concerned.
Again he denied using the words attributed to him, although it was not clear whether that included the politically explosive "pleb", reported in the Sun newspaper.
It had been, said Mr Mitchell, "a long and extremely frustrating day", though this was no excuse.
Having been told by officials last week that Mr Mitchell had not sworn at the police, it's now clear he did, although which words were actually used, we still do not know.
He could well do without some Lib Dem ministerial colleagues such as Home Office minister Jeremy Browne telling the BBC that there were still loose ends to tie up on the matter.
But they will be quietly hopeful in Downing Street that nothing has really emerged to undermine Mr Mitchell's basic account of last Wednesday's fracas.
He added: "I didn't show them the amount of respect I should have done."
He said the police officer involved had accepted his apology.When asked whether he had used the word "plebs", as is alleged in the Sun newspaper, Mr Mitchell did not answer directly, saying only that he had not used the words that have been reported.
The newspaper says it has seen the official police report of the incident, which does include the word.
Chair of the Metropolitan Police Federation John Tully told the BBC that Mr Mitchell's apology was not sufficient and an inquiry was needed to resolve the issue.
"He is calling the officer's integrity into question and that isn't acceptable from my point of view.
"I think the Downing Street officials should launch an inquiry as soon as possible to get to the truth."
The issue dominated the prime minister's official spokesman's lobby briefing on Monday, especially the apparently conflicting accounts given by Mr Mitchell and by the police.
Asked about the differences, the spokesman said the PM "obviously accepts the statement" from Mr Mitchell.
Continue reading the main story
“Start Quote
We are in Act Two of the Whitehall farce "What The Chief Whip Said"...”
It has also emerged that the
Metropolitan Police is investigating how police records of the incident
were obtained by the newspaper.
The force confirmed they had not made a complaint to Downing
Street and they were satisfied with how the officers involved dealt with
the incident.Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg - who had called for Mr Mitchell to give a full account of the row - said Mr Mitchell had been right to apologise and show contrition.
He said: "Being discourteous is a bad thing. He said the police officer has accepted his apology, which is significant. It is discourteous and just wrong to be rude to police officers."
Former Lib Dem leader Sir Ming Campbell said: "If Andrew Mitchell's determination was to draw two lines under this matter he hasn't achieved it."
And fellow Lib Dem Jeremy Browne, a Home Office minister, said: "I think people want to know what was said... explaining to the media what was not said, is not the same as explaining to the media what was said."
Labour's shadow policing minister David Hanson said: "If Number 10 don't believe the testimony of a number of Downing Street police officers that's very serious.
"Alternatively if the chief whip isn't telling the prime minister the full story that's equally as serious.
"The prime minister must ensure there is a proper investigation by the cabinet secretary and Andrew Mitchell needs to deliver a lot more answers very fast."
Nenhum comentário:
Postar um comentário