Japan told to halt Antarctic whaling by international court

• Japan told to halt Antarctic whaling by UN court

  
  Japan will have to halt hunts after judge rules it failed to justify the large number of minke whales it kills
  
  
  • Live Is there any 'scientific' basis for whaling?
  • Philip Hoare: This doesn't mean whales are safe
     

     

    Judge rules that Japanese whaling program is not scientific and that it failed to justify the number of minke whales it kills
  • Justin McCurry in Osaka
  • 
    
  • theguardian.com, Monday 31 March 2014 11.30 BST

  

  Three dead minke whales lie on the deck of the Japanese whaling vessel Nisshin Maru, in the Southern Ocean. Japan lost against Australia in a case on whaling in the International Court of Justice on Monday Photograph: Tim Watters/AP

  The International Court of Justice has ordered a temporary halt to
  Japan's annual slaughter of whales in the southern ocean after
  concluding that the hunts are not, as Japan claims, conducted for
  scientific research.
  
  The UN court's decision, by a 12-4 majority among a panel of judges,
  casts serious doubt over the long-term future of the jewel in the
  crown of Japan's controversial whaling programme.
  
  It also marks a dramatic victory for the Australian government, whose
  four-year campaign to ban the hunts rested on whether it could
  convince the court that Japan was using scientific research as a cover
  for commercial whaling.
  COPY http://www.theguardian.com
  In its 2010 application to the court, Australia accused Japan of
  failing to "observe in good faith the zero catch limit in relation to
  the killing of whales".
  
  Under the International Whaling Commission's 1986 ban on commercial
  whaling, Japan was permitted to kill a certain number of whales every
  year for what it called scientific research.
  
  The sale of meat from the hunts in restaurants and supermarkets, while
  not illegal, prompted accusations from Australia and other anti-whaling nations that Japan was cloaking a commercial operation "in the lab coat of science".
  
  In a lengthy ruling, the presiding judge in the Hague, Peter Tomka,
  said Japan had failed to prove that its pursuit of hundreds of mainly
  minke whales in Antarctic waters every winter – under a programme
  known as Jarpa II – was for scientific purposes.
  
  "The evidence does not establish that the programme's design and
  implementation are reasonable in relation to achieving its stated
  objectives," Tomka said.
  
  "The court concludes that the special permits granted by Japan for the
  killing, taking and treating of whales in connection with Jarpa II are
  not for purposes of scientific research," he added, before ordering
  Japan to cease its whaling programme "with immediate effect".
  
  Campaigners welcomed the ruling. "This is an historic decision which
  lays to rest, once and for all, the grim travesty of Japan's so-called
  'scientific' whaling and exposes it to the world as the blatant
  falsehood it clearly is," said Clare Perry, head of the cetaceans
  campaign at the UK-based Environmental Investigation Agency.
  
  "With this ruling, Japan must clearly cease its whaling activities in
  the Antarctic."
  
  The court ruled that Japan had not complied with its obligations
  covering scientific research as set out in article 8 of the 1946
  International Convention for the Regulation of Whaling.
  
  Japan, though, had maintained that its annual slaughter of 850 minke
  whales and up to 50 endangered fin whales every year was necessary to examine the age, health, feeding habits, exposure to toxins and other characteristics of whale populations, with a view to the possible
  resumption of sustainable commercial whaling.
  
  Officials in Tokyo said the data could not be obtained through
  non-lethal methods.
  
  Tomka, however, said Japan had not offered sufficient scientific
  justification for the slaughter of a large number of minke whales,
  while failing to kill enough fin and humpback whales to be of any
  scientific value. It had also failed to explore the possibility of
  gathering certain scientific data without resorting to killing the
  mammals, he added.
  
  In its defence, Japan cited only two peer-reviewed scientific papers
  relating to its program from 2005 to the present, during which it has
  harpooned 3,600 minke whales, a handful of fin whales, and no humpback whales.
  
  Tuesday's decision, though, leaves room for Japan to revamp its
  whaling programme to meet an international whaling treaty's
  requirements for scientific whaling.
  
  And it does not mean the end to all whaling. Japan hunts a much
  smaller number of whales in the northern Pacific, while Norway and
  Iceland continue to kill whales for their commercial value, in
  defiance of the IWC ban.
  
  Japan has slaughtered more than 10,000 whales since the IWC moratorium came into effect, according to the Australian government.
  
  Japan had questioned the court's right to rule on the case, but said
  before the ruling that it would accept its verdict. The court's
  judgements are binding and cannot be appealed.
  
  Monday's ruling is unlikely to have much impact on the Japanese
  public, whose appetite for whale meat has declined dramatically since
  the immediate postwar period.
  
  In recent years, stocks of whale meat have remained unsold, with
  almost 4,600 tonnes stored in port freezers at the end of 2012,
  according to Japanese government statistics.
  
  Campaigners said they hoped the verdict would result in a permanent
  end to Japan's whaling programme in the southern ocean.
  
  "The myth that this hunt was in any way scientific can now be
  dismissed once and for all," said Willie MacKenzie, oceans campaigner
  for Greenpeace UK. "We urge Japan to abide by this decision and not
  attempt to continue whaling through any newly invented loopholes."
  
  • COPY http://www.theguardian.com