Search for Missing Jet Is Moved Nearly 700 Miles, Based on Radar Analysis
By KEITH BRADSHER and MICHELLE INNIS
An analysis showed that Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 was moving faster
than investigators had previously estimated and therefore could have run
out of fuel sooner, officials said.
KUALA
LUMPUR, Malaysia — Australia announced on Friday that it had moved the
search area for Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 nearly 700 miles to the
northeast, the latest in a long series of changes by the authorities on
where they think the plane might have disappeared.
The
authority said it was acting after further analysis of radar data from
when the plane, which was supposed to be flying from Kuala Lumpur to
Beijing, instead turned over the South China Sea and flew back over
Peninsular Malaysia. The analysis showed that the aircraft was moving
faster than previously estimated and so would have used more fuel.
That
in turn would mean that the aircraft could have run out of fuel sooner
as it flew out over the southern Indian Ocean, according to the
Australian Maritime Safety Authority.
“This
is a credible new lead and will be thoroughly investigated today,”
Prime Minister Tony Abbott of Australia said in a statement on Friday
morning, adding that 10 aircraft, six vessels and various satellites
would focus on the new search area.
Mikael
Robertsson, a co-founder of Flightradar24, an aviation tracking firm
based in Stockholm, said that the unusual speed of the aircraft over
peninsular Malaysia following its turnaround over the South China Sea
could be explained either as an attempt by pilots to race to a runway to
land the plane in response to an aircraft malfunction or else as part
of an effort to hide from the authorities.
“Either
they wanted to land very fast or they wanted to escape radar coverage
as soon as possible,” he said. “You burn a lot more fuel when you fly
very fast, so normally you try to avoid it.”
The
revision of the search area, based on further analysis by an
international team of experts working with Malaysian officials, means
that Australia is redirecting the search far from the floating objects
seen in the previous search area in satellite images released by
Australia, China and the European satellite launch company Airbus
Defense and Space.
Those objects were in or very near the previous search area, as satellite operators had trained their cameras there.
At
123,000 square miles, or 319,000 square kilometers, the new area is
about the size of New Mexico and is only one-fifth of the size of the
previous search area. John Young, the director general of the Maritime
Safety Authority, said at a news conference near Canberra on Friday that
the ocean is 2,000 to 4,000 meters deep in the new search area, or
6,500 to 13,000 feet, making it shallower in some places than the
previous search area.
Mr.
Young also said at the news conference that the weather in the new
search area should be considerably better than that of the zone
previously searched.
The
new zone is 1,150 miles west-southwest of Perth, Australia, closer to
Perth than the previous zone, shortening the flight for surveillance
aircraft by up to an hour in each direction and allowing aircrews to
spend more time actually looking for debris from Flight 370.
“It
is a different ballpark,” said Erik van Sebille, an oceanographer of
New South Wales University, of the new search area. “Where they are
searching now is more like a subtropical ocean. It is not nearly as bad
as the southern Indian Ocean, which should make the search easier.”
“The
water in this area is more like the oceans around the Bahamas,” Dr. van
Sebille added. But he also warned that the seabed in the area is marked
by a steep ridge and that prevailing currents drag in more debris from
other parts of the ocean.
“It
may be harder to spot from the air the debris related to the plane
because there is more garbage floating in this area,” he said.
The
new zone also creates a further challenge in finding the data recorders
from the missing Boeing 777-200, which are believed to have sunk to the
ocean floor wherever the aircraft first hit the surface of the sea.
Aircraft and ships have dropped buoys and tracked them for the past week
in the previous search area in an attempt to document sea currents and
figure out how far floating debris might have drifted from the original
point of impact.
The
new search area is farther north, in an area where currents tend to be
less strong, but also may not have been tracked in as much detail in the
past week. The currents to the northeast of the search area are more
likely to move north or east, possibly toward Australia, oceanographers
said earlier this week.
Asked
whether the search over the past week had been a waste of time, Mr.
Young replied that big changes like this were not unusual in searches.
“This actually happens to us all the time, that new information that is
out of sequence with the operation at the time,” he added.
Martin
Dolan, the chief commissioner of the Australian Transport Safety
Bureau, cautioned at the same news conference that the search area was
still large, and that further analyses could yet result in another
change in the search area.
“This has a long way to go yet,” Mr. Dolan said.
Mr.
Dolan did take a strong position on one issue that international
aviation experts have described as unclear: who should have legal
control over floating debris or any wreckage that may be found on the
sea floor.
China
has sent a small flotilla of ships to the search area, which lies in
international waters, although closer to Australia than the previous
search area. While past practice has been for the country of the missing
aircraft’s jurisdiction to oversee an investigation, which is Malaysia
in this case, international aviation experts have said that it is
legally possible that China could try to conduct its own retrieval
operation to analyze possible causes of the crash.
Malaysia
has authorized Australia to conduct search and rescue efforts on its
behalf in the southern Indian Ocean. Mr. Dolan emphatically said that
any wreckage that is found should be held on behalf of Malaysia,
although he did not specifically mention the possibility of a Malaysian
salvage effort.
As
the search in the Indian Ocean continued, the flight simulator and hard
drives that the pilots of Flight 370 had at their homes appeared to be a
dead end, yielding few clues that shed any light on whether they
deliberately diverted the missing jet, according to two people briefed
on the investigation. They spoke on the condition on anonymity because
they did not want to jeopardize their access to secret information.
Malaysian
authorities seized the devices early in their inquiry and, after
initially keeping American officials at a distance, turned to the F.B.I.
last week for help in analyzing them. The Malaysians were particularly
interested in learning what it was that the captain of the flight
apparently deleted from the simulator.
The
F.B.I.'s spokesman, Michael Kortan, said the bureau would not discuss
what it had found on the hard drives because the investigation was
continuing.
Though
investigators are still focusing on the pilots’ role in the plane’s
disappearance on March 8, no concrete evidence has come to light to
indicate that they sabotaged the flight.
James
B. Comey, the F.B.I. director, testified in Washington on Wednesday
before the House Appropriations Committee that the bureau was close to
completing its analysis of the pilots’ simulator and hard drives.
A
review of shipping in the southeastern Indian Ocean on the morning that
Flight 370 disappeared and in the subsequent days shows few ships that
might have seen the plane come down or any debris.
One
of the few ships happens to be the Xue Long, China’s only icebreaker.
It was steaming northeast across the southeastern Indian Ocean through
early and mid-March, although it was nearly 1,000 miles to the southwest
of the new search area when the plane came down on March 8, according
to an analysis of satellite ship-tracking data by IHS Maritime, a global
shipping consulting firm.
The
Xue Long kept going northeast for the next week, past the northern
fringe of the new search area, to Fremantle, a port close to Perth. A
Beijing official involved in Xue Long’s polar research said that no one
aboard the icebreaker had seen any aircraft debris as it sailed toward
Fremantle, and that the ship had only been ordered on March 21 to turn
around and go back to the southeastern Indian Ocean to join search
operations.
COPY http://www.nytimes.com/
Nenhum comentário:
Postar um comentário