New U.S. defense chief: withdrawal from Afghanistan under review

Photo

New U.S. defense chief: withdrawal from Afghanistan under review

KABUL - Washington is reviewing a plan to withdraw U.S. troops from Afghanistan by 2016 to ensure that "progress sticks" after more than a decade of war, new U.S. Defense Secretary Ash Carter told reporters in Kabul on Saturday.

New U.S. defense chief: withdrawal from Afghanistan under review

KABUL Sat Feb 21, 2015 9:01am EST
U.S. Secretary of Defense Ash Carter (C) is greeted by Senior Military Assistant U.S. Army Major General Ron Lewis (L) as they arrive to travel to Afghanistan from Joint Base Andrews, Maryland February 20, 2015. REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst
U.S. Secretary of Defense Ash Carter (C) is greeted by Senior Military Assistant U.S. Army Major General Ron Lewis (L) as they arrive to travel to Afghanistan from Joint Base Andrews, Maryland February 20, 2015.
Credit: Reuters/Jonathan Ernst
(Reuters) - Washington is reviewing a plan to withdraw U.S. troops from Afghanistan by 2016 to ensure that "progress sticks" after more than a decade of war, new U.S. Defense Secretary Ash Carter told reporters in Kabul on Saturday.
Under the current plan, the United States will halve the number of troops in Afghanistan to 5,000 this year, gradually winding down to a "normal" U.S. embassy presence by 2016.
That schedule could now change, said Carter on his first trip abroad since swearing in as the Pentagon chief on Tuesday, as the United States rethinks the future of its counter-terrorism mission in Afghanistan.
His remarks set the stage for talks next month when the Afghan president is expected in Washington.
"Our priority now is to make sure this progress sticks," Carter said at a joint conference with President Ashraf Ghani, hours after landing in Kabul.
"That is why President (Barack) Obama is considering a number of options to reinforce our support for President Ghani's security strategy, including possible changes to the timeline for our drawdown of U.S. troops."
Ghani said he expected to discuss U.S. troop numbers with Obama "in the context of the larger partnership."
The current strategy has drawn sharp criticism from Republicans in Congress, who say that hard-won gains made against the Taliban could be lost in much the same way that sectarian violence returned to Iraq after the U.S. withdrawal.
Afghanistan's national army and police suffered heavy losses last year, the bloodiest since the war against Taliban militants began in 2001.
The emergence of a small number of militants in Afghanistan aligning themselves with Islamic State, which swept into northern Iraq last summer, has underscored anxieties about the dangers as foreign forces withdraw.
Carter said the Islamic State's presence in Afghanistan appeared "aspirational"."
But he also acknowledged the future of the U.S. counter-terrorism mission was also under review.
"We are discussing and rethinking the details of the counter-terrorism mission and how the environment has changed here with respect to terrorism, since we first laid out our plans," Carter said.
Discussions about the way forward in Afghanistan, Carter said, were possible thanks to the political progress in Kabul, where Ghani's pro-Western unity government succeeded former president Hamid Karzai last year.
Once the darling of the international community, Karzai made fervently anti-Western speeches in his later years in power and resisted U.S. pressure to sign a crucial security treaty.
Carter, who this week became Obama's fourth defense secretary, is a former Pentagon No. 2 with deep roots in U.S. policy on Afghanistan. He said Saturday marked his tenth official visit to the country, even though it was his first at the helm of the Department of Defense.
Neither he nor Ghani made predictions about peace efforts with the Taliban, after senior Pakistani army, Afghan and diplomatic officials said the Afghan Taliban signaled they were willing to open peace talks.
But Ghani sounded upbeat.
"The grounds for peace have never been better in the last 36 years. Our approach is productive. We're hopeful," Ghani said.
"But categorical answers in a peace process are dangerous."
(Writing by Kay Johnson; Editing by Nick Macfie; Editing by Ruth Pitchford)
copy  http://www.reuters.com/

Nenhum comentário:

Postar um comentário

Postagem em destaque

Ao Planalto, deputados criticam proposta de Guedes e veem drible no teto com mudança no Fundeb Governo quer que parte do aumento na participação da União no Fundeb seja destinada à transferência direta de renda para famílias pobres

Para ajudar a educação, Políticos e quem recebe salários altos irão doar 30% do soldo que recebem mensalmente, até o Governo Federal ter f...