Goodbye to private messages? Widely criticised new UK spying laws 'to get even worse' New laws allow police to look at your entire internet history Tax and immigration officers granted powers to hack phones Parliament launches scathing attack on Snoopers' Charter
UK spying laws: Government introduces law requiring WhatsApp and iMessage to break their own security
The draft Investigatory Powers Bill, or Snoopers'
Charter, keeps a provision that weakening of security will only happen
in cases where it is ‘practicable’, but that could still allow the
Government to outlaw many of the most popular chat services as they
currently exist
A security camera overlooks the radar domes of RAF Menwith Hill in north Yorkshire. Getty Images
The Government is pushing through a bill that will cripple WhatsApp and iMessage as they currently exist.
The bill has been re-drafted after it was criticised by every
parliamentary committee responsible for scrutinising it, but many of the
most controversial powers remain.
The new draft of the Investigatory Powers Bill includes a clause that
forces technology companies to weaken their security when spies need it
to. That includes the removal of end-to-end encryption, the technology
that allows services like WhatsApp, iMessage and FaceTime to allow
people to communicate securely.
The Government said that it had re-written the law to respond to
concerns about the weakening of encryption, and that it would no longer
force them to weaken encryption. It will only force companies to weaken
security that they themselves applied, for instance.
But the new law could still force companies to install backdoors in
their security, undermining the technology used in many of the most
popular chat apps.
Charities including Privacy International criticised the bill,
arguing that no changes had been made to guarantee people's security.
"It would be shameful to even consider this change cosmetic," said
Gus Hosein, the executive director of Privacy International. "The Bill
published today continues to adhere to the structure and the underlying
rationale that underpinned the draft IP Bill, despite the criticism and
lengthy list of recommendations from three Parliamentary Committees.
"The continued inclusion of powers for bulk interception and bulk
equipment interference - hacking by any other name - leaves the right to
privacy dangerously undermined and the security of our infrastructure
at risk. Despite this, the Home Office stands by its claim that the Bill
represents "world-leading" legislation. It is truly world-leading, for
all the wrong reasons."
The bill also requires that internet companies keep information on
everything their users have looked at for an entire year. That
information can then be accessed by the Government.
The new changes to the draft bill widen the situations where those
powers can be used. Law enforcement will now be able to access internet
usage records for pursuing “investigative leads”, after concerns that
police would not be able to get hold of them for missing people
inquiries and other investigations.
The ban on encryption only requires companies to remove the security
features when it is deemed “practicable”. Technology companies have
repeatedly complained that it isn’t clear what that restriction means.
The new bill does include new explicit checks on that measure, making
clear that the test must include a consideration of how much it would
cost to remove that encryption, for instance.
If the powers are used as written, they could lead to the outlawing
of many of the world’s most popular internet services — or force
products including Apple’s iOS, which powers the iPhone and iPad, to be
re-written from the ground up.
But those same restrictions could bring the bill into conflict with
other . The draft powers do not make clear how the Government would
treat instances of extra-territorial conflict, meaning that the new bill
could force companies to break the law in other countries to satisfy
the UK powers.
Technology companies have also worried that the powers to weaken
encrypted chat services could set a precedent and lead to them also
being instituted by other countries with fewer protections.
The Government hopes that it can pass the bill by the end of the
year. It claims that it is necessary because many of the laws allowing
for spying will go out of date in 2016, and says that passing it will
allow all of those powers to be brought under one umbrella.
copy http://www.independent.co.uk
Nenhum comentário:
Postar um comentário